Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating nf-core-modules #685

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

asp8200
Copy link
Contributor

@asp8200 asp8200 commented Jul 25, 2022

#684

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
    • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
    • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/sarek branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 25, 2022

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 9118d64

+| ✅ 145 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   4 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   1 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • readme - README did not have a Nextflow minimum version badge.

❔ Tests ignored:

  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: assets/nf-core-sarek_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-sarek_logo_light.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: docs/images/nf-core-sarek_logo_dark.png
  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: lib/NfcoreTemplate.groovy

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.4.1
  • Run at 2022-07-28 08:56:08

@asp8200 asp8200 requested a review from SusiJo July 25, 2022 13:41
@asp8200 asp8200 mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2022
10 tasks
@SusiJo
Copy link
Contributor

SusiJo commented Jul 26, 2022

Hey @asp8200,
There was already a PR to update the modules which was not merged in the end. There were some questions and concerns of @maxulysse and @FriederikeHanssen. Are these clarified now?

@asp8200
Copy link
Contributor Author

asp8200 commented Jul 27, 2022

Hey @asp8200, There was already a PR to update the modules which was not merged in the end. There were some questions and concerns of @maxulysse and @FriederikeHanssen. Are these clarified now?

@SusiJo : I wasn't aware of your PR. @maxulysse asked me to update the modules so I went ahead with that.

I had a discussion with @maxulysse about whether it was okay to just pass the empty list [], instead of a target-bed, as the second paramenter to BCFTOOLS_STATS in subworkflows/nf-core/vcf_qc.nf (#686 (comment)). We agreed that it was okay for now, and that it could be fixed in a later PR - if necessary.

Now I don't know whether this PR should be merged or we should try to revive @SusiJo 's PR. Let me know your opinion :-)

@asp8200 asp8200 marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2022 17:59
@asp8200 asp8200 requested a review from maxulysse as a code owner July 27, 2022 17:59
@asp8200 asp8200 requested a review from SusiJo July 27, 2022 19:14
@SusiJo
Copy link
Contributor

SusiJo commented Jul 28, 2022

No please go ahead :) My PR did not update the other modules, like yours.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@maxulysse maxulysse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
Let's try out this stageAs: "?/*"

@asp8200 asp8200 merged commit 89d1574 into nf-core:dev Jul 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants