Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add documentation for process.features #54897

Merged

Conversation

marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member

Documenting process.features.

Refs: #54295

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. labels Sep 12, 2024
@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito force-pushed the fix/document-process-features branch 3 times, most recently from 95d9102 to 26cf87c Compare September 12, 2024 10:14
## `process.features.cached_builtins`

<!-- YAML
added: REPLACEME
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#27311

Suggested change
added: REPLACEME
added: v12.0.0

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand, why were all these suggestions resolved but not applied?

Copy link
Member Author

@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito Sep 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see I have overwritten the commit with the suggestions with a rebase, probably not updated the remote and force pushed https://github.com/nodejs/node/compare/15d260e6bef2c00f1ca9ef84fa361a551d82976e..e3f91db3ae988513599915ad8f6e73068f2bb0da

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've opened #54982 to fix this.

doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/api/process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@avivkeller avivkeller added the commit-queue-squash Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one. label Sep 12, 2024
@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 12, 2024
@lpinca lpinca added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 13, 2024
@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito force-pushed the fix/document-process-features branch from 15d260e to e3f91db Compare September 13, 2024 15:34
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 14, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit cb20c5b into nodejs:main Sep 14, 2024
14 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in cb20c5b

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
PR-URL: #54897
Refs: #54295
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2024
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
PR-URL: #54897
Refs: #54295
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
PR-URL: #54897
Refs: #54295
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
PR-URL: #54897
Refs: #54295
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
@aduh95 aduh95 mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2024
louwers pushed a commit to louwers/node that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#54897
Refs: nodejs#54295
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito added the backport-requested-v20.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v20.x-staging branch. label Nov 16, 2024
tpoisseau pushed a commit to tpoisseau/node that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#54897
Refs: nodejs#54295
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. backport-requested-v20.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v20.x-staging branch. commit-queue-squash Add this label to instruct the Commit Queue to squash all the PR commits into the first one. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants