Skip to content

Conversation

@pgandhi999
Copy link
Owner

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)

How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

holdenk and others added 21 commits July 21, 2017 16:50
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Update the Quickstart and RDD programming guides to mention pip.

## How was this patch tested?

Built docs locally.

Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>

Closes #18698 from holdenk/SPARK-21434-add-pyspark-pip-documentation.
…ut committer

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It's a follow-up of #18689 , which forgot to remove a useless test.

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #18716 from cloud-fan/test.
…own.

Executors run a thread pool with daemon threads to run tasks. This means
that those threads remain active when the JVM is shutting down, meaning
those tasks are affected by code that runs in shutdown hooks.

So if a shutdown hook messes with something that the task is using (e.g.
an HDFS connection), the task will fail and will report that failure to
the driver. That will make the driver mark the task as failed regardless
of what caused the executor to shut down. So, for example, if YARN pre-empted
that executor, the driver would consider that task failed when it should
instead ignore the failure.

This change avoids reporting failures to the driver when shutdown hooks
are executing; this fixes the YARN preemption accounting, and doesn't really
change things much for other scenarios, other than reporting a more generic
error ("Executor lost") when the executor shuts down unexpectedly - which
is arguably more correct.

Tested with a hacky app running on spark-shell that tried to cause failures
only when shutdown hooks were running, verified that preemption didn't cause
the app to fail because of task failures exceeding the threshold.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #18594 from vanzin/SPARK-20904.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

When the code that is generated is greater than 64k, then Janino compile will fail and CodeGenerator.scala will log the entire code at Error level.
SPARK-20871 suggests only logging the code at Debug level.
Since, the code is already logged at debug level, this Pull Request proposes not including the formatted code in the Error logging and exception message at all.
When an exception occurs, the code will be logged at Info level but truncated if it is more than 1000 lines long.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests were run.
An extra test test case was added to CodeFormatterSuite to test the new maxLines parameter,

Author: pj.fanning <pj.fanning@workday.com>

Closes #18658 from pjfanning/SPARK-20871.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes the `****` string from test names in FlatMapGroupsWithStateSuite. `***` is a common string developers grep for when using Scala test (because it immediately shows the failing test cases). The existence of the `****` in test names disrupts that workflow.

## How was this patch tested?
N/A - test only change.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #18715 from rxin/FlatMapGroupsWithStateStar.
…ent after executing peristent

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR avoids to reuse unpersistent dataset among test cases by making dataset unpersistent at the end of each test case.

In `DatasetCacheSuite`, the test case `"get storage level"` does not make dataset unpersisit after make the dataset persisitent. The same dataset will be made persistent by the test case `"persist and then rebind right encoder when join 2 datasets"` Thus, we run these test cases, the second case does not perform to make dataset persistent. This is because in

When we run only the second case, it performs to make dataset persistent. It is not good to change behavior of the second test suite. The first test case should correctly make dataset unpersistent.

```
Testing started at 17:52 ...
01:52:15.053 WARN org.apache.hadoop.util.NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java classes where applicable
01:52:48.595 WARN org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CacheManager: Asked to cache already cached data.
01:52:48.692 WARN org.apache.spark.sql.execution.CacheManager: Asked to cache already cached data.
01:52:50.864 WARN org.apache.spark.storage.RandomBlockReplicationPolicy: Expecting 1 replicas with only 0 peer/s.
01:52:50.864 WARN org.apache.spark.storage.RandomBlockReplicationPolicy: Expecting 1 replicas with only 0 peer/s.
01:52:50.868 WARN org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager: Block rdd_8_1 replicated to only 0 peer(s) instead of 1 peers
01:52:50.868 WARN org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager: Block rdd_8_0 replicated to only 0 peer(s) instead of 1 peers
```

After this PR, these messages do not appear
```
Testing started at 18:14 ...
02:15:05.329 WARN org.apache.hadoop.util.NativeCodeLoader: Unable to load native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java classes where applicable

Process finished with exit code 0
```

## How was this patch tested?

Used the existing test

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #18719 from kiszk/SPARK-21512.
…ash aggregate

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In #18483 , we fixed the data copy bug when saving into `InternalRow`, and removed all workarounds for this bug in the aggregate code path. However, the object hash aggregate was missed, this PR fixes it.

This patch is also a requirement for #17419 , which shows that DataFrame version is slower than RDD version because of this issue.

## How was this patch tested?

existing tests

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #18712 from cloud-fan/minor.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With supervise enabled for a driver, re-launching it was failing because the driver had the same framework Id. This patch creates a new driver framework id every time we re-launch a driver, but we keep the driver submission id the same since that is the same with the task id the driver was launched with on mesos and retry state and other info within Dispatcher's data structures uses that as a key.
We append a "-retry-%4d" string as a suffix to the framework id passed by the dispatcher to the driver and the same value to the app_id created by each driver, except the first time where we dont need the retry suffix.
The previous format for the frameworkId was   'DispactherFId-DriverSubmissionId'.

We also detect the case where we have multiple spark contexts started from within the same driver and we do set proper names to their corresponding app-ids. The old practice was to unset the framework id passed from the dispatcher after the driver framework was started for the first time and let mesos decide the framework ID for subsequent spark contexts. The decided fId was passed as an appID.
This patch affects heavily the history server. Btw we dont have the issues of the standalone case where driver id must be different since the dispatcher will re-launch a driver(mesos task) only if it gets an update that it is dead and this is verified by mesos implicitly. We also dont fix the fine grained mode which is deprecated and of no use.

## How was this patch tested?

This task was manually tested on dc/os. Launched a driver, stoped its container and verified the expected behavior.

Initial retry of the driver, driver in pending state:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7945591/28473862-1088b736-6e4f-11e7-8d7d-7b785b1da6a6.png)

Driver re-launched:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7945591/28473885-26e02d16-6e4f-11e7-9eb8-6bf7bdb10cb8.png)

Another re-try:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7945591/28473897-35702318-6e4f-11e7-9585-fd295ad7c6b6.png)

The resulted entries in history server at the bottom:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7945591/28473910-4946dabc-6e4f-11e7-90a6-fa4f80893c61.png)

Regarding multiple spark contexts here is the end result regarding the spark history server, for the second spark context we add an increasing number as a suffix:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7945591/28474432-69cf8b06-6e51-11e7-93c7-e6c0b04dec93.png)

Author: Stavros Kontopoulos <st.kontopoulos@gmail.com>

Closes #18705 from skonto/fix_supervise_flag.
…must call super.afterEach()

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR ensures to call `super.afterEach()` in overriding `afterEach()` method in `DatasetCacheSuite`. When we override `afterEach()` method in Testsuite, we have to call `super.afterEach()`.

This is a follow-up of #18719 and SPARK-21512.

## How was this patch tested?

Used the existing test suite

Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>

Closes #18721 from kiszk/SPARK-21516.
… KinesisInputDStream builder instead of deprecated KinesisUtils

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The examples and docs for Spark-Kinesis integrations use the deprecated KinesisUtils. We should update the docs to use the KinesisInputDStream builder to create DStreams.

## How was this patch tested?

The patch primarily updates the documents. The patch will also need to make changes to the Spark-Kinesis examples. The examples need to be tested.

Author: Yash Sharma <ysharma@atlassian.com>

Closes #18071 from yssharma/ysharma/kinesis_docs.
I find a bug about 'quick start',and created a new issues,Sean Owen  let
me to make a pull request, and I do

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)

## How was this patch tested?

(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: Trueman <lizhaoch@users.noreply.github.com>
Author: lizhaoch <lizhaoc@163.com>

Closes #18722 from lizhaoch/master.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

A shuffle service can serves blocks from multiple apps/tasks. Thus the shuffle service can suffers high memory usage when lots of shuffle-reads happen at the same time. In my cluster, OOM always happens on shuffle service. Analyzing heap dump, memory cost by Netty(ChannelOutboundBufferEntry) can be up to 2~3G. It might make sense to reject "open blocks" request when memory usage is high on shuffle service.

93dd0c5 and 85c6ce6 tried to alleviate the memory pressure on shuffle service but cannot solve the root cause. This pr proposes to control currency of shuffle read.

## How was this patch tested?
Added unit test.

Author: jinxing <jinxing6042@126.com>

Closes #18388 from jinxing64/SPARK-21175.
When NodeManagers launching Executors,
the `missing` value will exceed the
real value when the launch is slow, this can lead to YARN allocates more resource.

We add the `numExecutorsRunning` when calculate the `missing` to avoid this.

Test by experiment.

Author: DjvuLee <lihu@bytedance.com>

Closes #18651 from djvulee/YarnAllocate.
inprogress history file in some cases.

Add failure handling for EOFException that can be thrown during
decompression of an inprogress spark history file, treat same as case
where can't parse the last line.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Failure handling for case of EOFException thrown within the ReplayListenerBus.replay method to handle the case analogous to json parse fail case.  This path can arise in compressed inprogress history files since an incomplete compression block could be read (not flushed by writer on a block boundary).  See the stack trace of this occurrence in the jira ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21447)

## How was this patch tested?

Added a unit test that specifically targets validating the failure handling path appropriately when maybeTruncated is true and false.

Author: Eric Vandenberg <ericvandenberg@fb.com>

Closes #18673 from ericvandenbergfb/fix_inprogress_compr_history_file.
… .toMap

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

`Traversable.toMap` changed to 'collections.breakOut', that eliminates intermediate tuple collection creation, see [Stack Overflow article](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1715681/scala-2-8-breakout).

## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests run.
No performance tests performed yet.

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.

Author: iurii.ant <sereneant@gmail.com>

Closes #18693 from SereneAnt/performance_toMap-breakOut.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Like [Hive UDFType](https://hive.apache.org/javadocs/r2.0.1/api/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/UDFType.html), we should allow users to add the extra flags for ScalaUDF and JavaUDF too. _stateful_/_impliesOrder_ are not applicable to our Scala UDF. Thus, we only add the following two flags.

- deterministic: Certain optimizations should not be applied if UDF is not deterministic. Deterministic UDF returns same result each time it is invoked with a particular input. This determinism just needs to hold within the context of a query.

When the deterministic flag is not correctly set, the results could be wrong.

For ScalaUDF in Dataset APIs, users can call the following extra APIs for `UserDefinedFunction` to make the corresponding changes.
- `nonDeterministic`: Updates UserDefinedFunction to non-deterministic.

Also fixed the Java UDF name loss issue.

Will submit a separate PR for `distinctLike`  for UDAF

### How was this patch tested?
Added test cases for both ScalaUDF

Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Author: Wenchen Fan <cloud0fan@gmail.com>

Closes #17848 from gatorsmile/udfRegister.
…rnal service.

There was some code based on the old SASL handler in the new auth client that
was incorrectly using the SASL user as the user to authenticate against the
external shuffle service. This caused the external service to not be able to
find the correct secret to authenticate the connection, failing the connection.

In the course of debugging, I found that some log messages from the YARN shuffle
service were a little noisy, so I silenced some of them, and also added a couple
of new ones that helped find this issue. On top of that, I found that a check
in the code that records app secrets was wrong, causing more log spam and also
using an O(n) operation instead of an O(1) call.

Also added a new integration suite for the YARN shuffle service with auth on,
and verified it failed before, and passes now.

Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>

Closes #18706 from vanzin/SPARK-21494.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In our production cluster,oom happens when NettyBlockRpcServer receive OpenBlocks message.The reason we observed is below:
When BlockManagerManagedBuffer call ChunkedByteBuffer#toNetty, it will use Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(ByteBuffer... buffers) which use default maxNumComponents=16 in low-level CompositeByteBuf.When our component's number is bigger than 16, it will execute consolidateIfNeeded

        int numComponents = this.components.size();
        if(numComponents > this.maxNumComponents) {
            int capacity = ((CompositeByteBuf.Component)this.components.get(numComponents - 1)).endOffset;
            ByteBuf consolidated = this.allocBuffer(capacity);

            for(int c = 0; c < numComponents; ++c) {
                CompositeByteBuf.Component c1 = (CompositeByteBuf.Component)this.components.get(c);
                ByteBuf b = c1.buf;
                consolidated.writeBytes(b);
                c1.freeIfNecessary();
            }

            CompositeByteBuf.Component var7 = new CompositeByteBuf.Component(consolidated);
            var7.endOffset = var7.length;
            this.components.clear();
            this.components.add(var7);
        }

in CompositeByteBuf which will consume some memory during buffer copy.
We can use another api Unpooled. wrappedBuffer(int maxNumComponents, ByteBuffer... buffers) to avoid this comsuming.

## How was this patch tested?

Test in production cluster.

Author: zhoukang <zhoukang@xiaomi.com>

Closes #18723 from caneGuy/zhoukang/fix-chunkbuffer.
…s wrong temp files

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21524

ValidatorParamsSuiteHelpers.testFileMove() is generating temp dir in the wrong place and does not delete them.

ValidatorParamsSuiteHelpers.testFileMove() is invoked by TrainValidationSplitSuite and crossValidatorSuite. Currently it uses `tempDir` from `TempDirectory`, which unfortunately is never initialized since the `boforeAll()` of `ValidatorParamsSuiteHelpers` is never invoked.

In my system, it leaves some temp directories in the assembly folder each time I run the TrainValidationSplitSuite and crossValidatorSuite.

## How was this patch tested?
unit test fix

Author: Yuhao Yang <yuhao.yang@intel.com>

Closes #18728 from hhbyyh/tempDirFix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This change pulls the `LogisticAggregator` class out of LogisticRegression.scala and makes it extend `DifferentiableLossAggregator`. It also changes logistic regression to use the generic `RDDLossFunction` instead of having its own.

Other minor changes:
* L2Regularization accepts `Option[Int => Double]` for features standard deviation
* L2Regularization uses `Vector` type instead of Array
* Some tests added to LeastSquaresAggregator

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test suites are added.

Author: sethah <shendrickson@cloudera.com>

Closes #18305 from sethah/SPARK-20988.
…-in functions

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This generates a documentation for Spark SQL built-in functions.

One drawback is, this requires a proper build to generate built-in function list.
Once it is built, it only takes few seconds by `sql/create-docs.sh`.

Please see https://spark-test.github.io/sparksqldoc/ that I hosted to show the output documentation.

There are few more works to be done in order to make the documentation pretty, for example, separating `Arguments:` and `Examples:` but I guess this should be done within `ExpressionDescription` and `ExpressionInfo` rather than manually parsing it. I will fix these in a follow up.

This requires `pip install mkdocs` to generate HTMLs from markdown files.

## How was this patch tested?

Manually tested:

```
cd docs
jekyll build
```
,

```
cd docs
jekyll serve
```

and

```
cd sql
create-docs.sh
```

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #18702 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-21485.
@pgandhi999 pgandhi999 merged commit 55c6c37 into pgandhi999:master Jul 26, 2017
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There were two related fixes regarding `from_json`, `get_json_object` and `json_tuple` ([Fix #1](apache@c8803c0),
 [Fix #2](apache@86174ea)), but they weren't comprehensive it seems. I wanted to extend those fixes to all the parsers, and add tests for each case.

## How was this patch tested?

Regression tests

Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>

Closes apache#20302 from brkyvz/json-invfix.
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Solved two bugs to enable stream-stream self joins.

### Incorrect analysis due to missing MultiInstanceRelation trait
Streaming leaf nodes did not extend MultiInstanceRelation, which is necessary for the catalyst analyzer to convert the self-join logical plan DAG into a tree (by creating new instances of the leaf relations). This was causing the error `Failure when resolving conflicting references in Join:` (see JIRA for details).

### Incorrect attribute rewrite when splicing batch plans in MicroBatchExecution
When splicing the source's batch plan into the streaming plan (by replacing the StreamingExecutionPlan), we were rewriting the attribute reference in the streaming plan with the new attribute references from the batch plan. This was incorrectly handling the scenario when multiple StreamingExecutionRelation point to the same source, and therefore eventually point to the same batch plan returned by the source. Here is an example query, and its corresponding plan transformations.
```
val df = input.toDF
val join =
      df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value).join(
        df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value), "key")
```
Streaming logical plan before splicing the batch plan
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12  // two different leaves pointing to same source
```
Batch logical plan after splicing the batch plan and before rewriting
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12
```
Batch logical plan after rewriting the attributes. Specifically, for spliced, the new output attributes (value#66) replace the earlier output attributes (value#12, and value#1, one for each StreamingExecutionRelation).
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]       // both value#1 and value#12 replaces by value#66
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9, value#66]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```
This causes the optimizer to eliminate value#66 from one side of the join.
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9]   // this does not generate value, incorrect join results
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

**Solution**: Instead of rewriting attributes, use a Project to introduce aliases between the output attribute references and the new reference generated by the spliced plans. The analyzer and optimizer will take care of the rest.
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- Project [value#66 AS value#1]   // solution: project with aliases
   :     +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- Project [value#66 AS value#12]    // solution: project with aliases
         +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

## How was this patch tested?
New unit test

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes apache#20598 from tdas/SPARK-23406.
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There were two related fixes regarding `from_json`, `get_json_object` and `json_tuple` ([Fix #1](apache@c8803c0),
 [Fix #2](apache@86174ea)), but they weren't comprehensive it seems. I wanted to extend those fixes to all the parsers, and add tests for each case.

## How was this patch tested?

Regression tests

Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>

Closes apache#20302 from brkyvz/json-invfix.

(cherry picked from commit e01919e)
Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2018
This is a backport of apache#20598.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Solved two bugs to enable stream-stream self joins.

### Incorrect analysis due to missing MultiInstanceRelation trait
Streaming leaf nodes did not extend MultiInstanceRelation, which is necessary for the catalyst analyzer to convert the self-join logical plan DAG into a tree (by creating new instances of the leaf relations). This was causing the error `Failure when resolving conflicting references in Join:` (see JIRA for details).

### Incorrect attribute rewrite when splicing batch plans in MicroBatchExecution
When splicing the source's batch plan into the streaming plan (by replacing the StreamingExecutionPlan), we were rewriting the attribute reference in the streaming plan with the new attribute references from the batch plan. This was incorrectly handling the scenario when multiple StreamingExecutionRelation point to the same source, and therefore eventually point to the same batch plan returned by the source. Here is an example query, and its corresponding plan transformations.
```
val df = input.toDF
val join =
      df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value).join(
        df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value), "key")
```
Streaming logical plan before splicing the batch plan
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12  // two different leaves pointing to same source
```
Batch logical plan after splicing the batch plan and before rewriting
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]           // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12
```
Batch logical plan after rewriting the attributes. Specifically, for spliced, the new output attributes (value#66) replace the earlier output attributes (value#12, and value#1, one for each StreamingExecutionRelation).
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]       // both value#1 and value#12 replaces by value#66
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9, value#66]
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```
This causes the optimizer to eliminate value#66 from one side of the join.
```
Project [key#6, value#66, value#66]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66]
   :  +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9]   // this does not generate value, incorrect join results
      +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

**Solution**: Instead of rewriting attributes, use a Project to introduce aliases between the output attribute references and the new reference generated by the spliced plans. The analyzer and optimizer will take care of the rest.
```
Project [key#6, value#1, value#12]
+- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9)
   :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1]
   :  +- Project [value#66 AS value#1]   // solution: project with aliases
   :     +- LocalRelation [value#66]
   +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12]
      +- Project [value#66 AS value#12]    // solution: project with aliases
         +- LocalRelation [value#66]
```

## How was this patch tested?
New unit test

Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>

Closes apache#20765 from tdas/SPARK-23406-2.3.
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
…te temporary path in local staging directory

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Th environment of my cluster as follows:
```
OS:Linux version 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 (mockbuildc6b18n3.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 00:52:02 GMT 2012
Hadoop: 2.7.2
Spark: 2.3.0 or 3.0.0(master branch)
Hive: 1.2.1
```

My spark run on deploy mode yarn-client.

If I execute the SQL `insert overwrite local directory '/home/test/call_center/' select * from call_center`, a HiveException will appear as follows:
`Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: java.io.IOException: Mkdirs failed to create file:/home/xitong/hive/stagingdir_hive_2019-02-19_17-31-00_678_1816816774691551856-1/-ext-10000/_temporary/0/_temporary/attempt_20190219173233_0002_m_000000_3 (exists=false, cwd=file:/data10/yarn/nm-local-dir/usercache/xitong/appcache/application_1543893582405_6126857/container_e124_1543893582405_6126857_01_000011)
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveFileFormatUtils.getHiveRecordWriter(HiveFileFormatUtils.java:249)`
Current spark sql generate a local temporary path in local staging directory.The schema of local temporary path start with `file`, so the HiveException appears.
This PR change the local temporary path to HDFS temporary path, and use DistributedFileSystem instance copy the data from HDFS temporary path to local directory.
If Spark run on local deploy mode, 'insert overwrite local directory' works fine.
## How was this patch tested?

UT cannot support yarn-client mode.The test is in my product environment.

Closes apache#23841 from beliefer/fix-bug-of-insert-overwrite-local-dir.

Authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR supports `OpenJ9` in addition to `IBM JDK` and `OpenJDK` in Spark by handling `System.getProperty("java.vendor") = "Eclipse OpenJ9"`.

In `inferDefaultMemory()` and `getKrb5LoginModuleName()`, this PR uses non `IBM` way.

```
$ ~/jdk-11.0.2+9_openj9-0.12.1/bin/jshell
|  Welcome to JShell -- Version 11.0.2
|  For an introduction type: /help intro

jshell> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vendor"))
Eclipse OpenJ9

jshell> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.info"))
JRE 11 Linux amd64-64-Bit Compressed References 20190204_127 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
OpenJ9   - 90dd8cb40
OMR      - d2f4534b
JCL      - 289c70b6844 based on jdk-11.0.2+9

jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.ibm.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean").getDeclaredMethod("getTotalPhysicalMemory"))
public abstract long com.ibm.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemory()

jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean").getDeclaredMethod("getTotalPhysicalMemorySize"))
public abstract long com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemorySize()

jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule"))
|  Exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule
|        at Class.forNameImpl (Native Method)
|        at Class.forName (Class.java:339)
|        at (#1:1)

jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule"))
class com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule
```

## How was this patch tested?

Existing test suites
Manual testing with OpenJ9.

Closes apache#24308 from kiszk/SPARK-27397.

Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
pgandhi999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2019
…comparison assertions

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR removes a few hardware-dependent assertions which can cause a failure in `aarch64`.

**x86_64**
```
rootdonotdel-openlab-allinone-l00242678:/home/ubuntu# uname -a
Linux donotdel-openlab-allinone-l00242678 4.4.0-154-generic apache#181-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 25 05:29:03 UTC
2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

scala> import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits
import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits
scala> floatToRawIntBits(0.0f/0.0f)
res0: Int = -4194304
scala> floatToRawIntBits(Float.NaN)
res1: Int = 2143289344
```

**aarch64**
```
[rootarm-huangtianhua spark]# uname -a
Linux arm-huangtianhua 4.14.0-49.el7a.aarch64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 10 17:22:26 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

scala> import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits
import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits
scala> floatToRawIntBits(0.0f/0.0f)
res1: Int = 2143289344
scala> floatToRawIntBits(Float.NaN)
res2: Int = 2143289344
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins (This removes the test coverage).

Closes apache#25186 from huangtianhua/special-test-case-for-aarch64.

Authored-by: huangtianhua <huangtianhua@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.