Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resuming gameplay by clicking orange cursor can cause a hit on the underlying circle #9658

Closed
kathelynn opened this issue Jul 23, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by ppy/osu-framework#6225
Assignees
Labels
area:gameplay priority:1 Very important. Feels bad without fix. Affects the majority of users. ruleset/osu!

Comments

@kathelynn
Copy link

kathelynn commented Jul 23, 2020

Describe the bug:
'Click the orange cursor' screen has weird behavior where it would register a hitcircle press.
The hitcircle doesn't disappear when a hit is registered. Might be potentially registering two presses, but I haven't tested this very well yet.
Works both on slider's hitcircle and normal hitcircles.
Screenshots or videos showing encountered issue:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15YjV__Tz4P8694FNAE6I3crFbsq4gpCp/view?usp=sharing
osu!lazer version:
2020.723.0

@bdach bdach changed the title Hitcircle duplication in 'click the orange cursor' screen Resuming gameplay by clicking orange cursor can cause a hit on the underlying circle Jul 23, 2020
@peppy
Copy link
Member

peppy commented Jul 27, 2020

This is an interesting problem because we actually do want to register mouse down (in the case where the mouse was being held before pause was triggered).

@sawawas
Copy link

sawawas commented Mar 6, 2024

sorry... i thought after clicking the orange cursor it should start letting you click in game which is how you are able to resume sliders (which is how it should work if it's possible imo... maybe a toggle or something?)

apart from that maybe it can just not make you miss and it'll feel the same
idk it's really annoying

@frenzibyte
Copy link
Member

This incorrect behaviour stems from two distinct problems here:

  1. The OsuResumeOverlay has no control over blocking the action from reaching the gameplay components, despite returning true on the event. This is because the overlay is wrapped in an input manager that is separate from the gameplay components, and when it handles the press event it receives, it only blocks it from the hierarchy that's under its local input manager (this one).
    • We can resolve this by scheduling the resume operation one frame forward so that the press event flows through the entire game scene and finishes before the input manager of the gameplay components is enabled and sees it.
  2. When gameplay is resumed, a Sync() operation is performed on the input manager of the gameplay components. Sync() reads the state of the parent input manager and notices the click-to-resume action pressed, so it incorrectly applies the press to itself, causing the hit objects to receive the unwanted press event.
    • This behaviour was added since Make PassThroughInputManager sync with parent input state osu-framework#1682.
    • This affects all input methods except for mouse. The method checks whether the parent has any mouse buttons that are released in the parent state, it does not check for presses like it does for other input methods.
    • To resolve this, I would propose changing behaviour of Sync() for all input methods to match mouse buttons (only apply a release on Sync(), never apply a press). And for the issue that this behaviour was introduced for, that should be handled on a more specific level (i.e. only sync presses on LoadComplete).

cc @ppy/team-client for opinions. I believe there is another way to resolve issue 1 but I was encountering issues with it that I couldn't understand in reasonable time, if scheduling the resume operation for just one frame is seen completely bad, then I can continue exploring through the other path (it involves framework changes to PassThroughInputManager as well, to say the least).

@peppy
Copy link
Member

peppy commented Mar 19, 2024

at face value both of the proposals make sense to me.

@bdach
Copy link
Collaborator

bdach commented Mar 19, 2024

We can resolve this by scheduling the resume operation one frame forward so that the press event flows through the entire game scene and finishes before the input manager of the gameplay components is enabled and sees it.

I have bad feelings about this one. Hopefully they're unfounded, but relying on schedules for that sorta thing feels like asking for trouble later.

To resolve this, I would propose changing behaviour of Sync() for all input methods to match mouse buttons (only apply a release on Sync(), never apply a press). And for the issue that this behaviour was introduced for, that should be handled on a more specific level (i.e. only sync presses on LoadComplete).

I'm not sure I understand the implications of this one well enough just from that description. Maybe fine. But risky change.

Maybe you could make this settable on the concrete input manager instance somehow, via a flag or something.

@frenzibyte
Copy link
Member

We can resolve this by scheduling the resume operation one frame forward so that the press event flows through the entire game scene and finishes before the input manager of the gameplay components is enabled and sees it.

I have bad feelings about this one. Hopefully they're unfounded, but relying on schedules for that sorta thing feels like asking for trouble later.

I will continue exploring through the other path I mentioned at the bottom of #9658 (comment) and report back if it spirals out of control, as a justification for resorting to a schedule.

To resolve this, I would propose changing behaviour of Sync() for all input methods to match mouse buttons (only apply a release on Sync(), never apply a press). And for the issue that this behaviour was introduced for, that should be handled on a more specific level (i.e. only sync presses on LoadComplete).

I'm not sure I understand the implications of this one well enough just from that description. Maybe fine. But risky change.

Maybe you could make this settable on the concrete input manager instance somehow, via a flag or something.

Hmm, I cannot say I like having that, especially since gameplay is almost the only real usage of PassThroughInputManager, but that's fine if it lowers down concern.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:gameplay priority:1 Very important. Feels bad without fix. Affects the majority of users. ruleset/osu!
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants