-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #104273
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #104273
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This implements the `Linker::{link_whole_staticlib,link_whole_rlib}` methods for the `WasmLd` linker used on wasm targets. Previously these methods were noops since I think historically `wasm-ld` did not have support for `--whole-archive` but nowadays it does, so the flags are passed through.
Corresponding subsection in async book is not `07.05` not `07.06`. The information on the linked page is the same so it may be reasonable to remove the whole sentence.
This allows retrying binding TCP Socket multiple times. This is useful when using emulators as network might not be available in the beginning. This was orignally implemented in rust-lang#100316 Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
Do not point at whole statement, only at the expression (skip pointing at `;`)
… `Future::Output` No longer lint against `#[must_use] async fn foo()`. When encountering a statement that awaits on a `Future`, check if the `Future`'s parent item is annotated with `#[must_use]` and emit a lint if so. This effectively makes `must_use` an annotation on the `Future::Output` instead of only the `Future` itself. Fix rust-lang#78149.
… r=tmandry Consider `#[must_use]` annotation on `async fn` as also affecting the `Future::Output` No longer lint against `#[must_use] async fn foo()`. When encountering a statement that awaits on a `Future`, check if the `Future`'s parent item is annotated with `#[must_use]` and emit a lint if so. This effectively makes `must_use` an annotation on the `Future::Output` instead of only the `Future` itself. Fix rust-lang#78149.
…ve, r=estebank Implement the `+whole-archive` modifier for `wasm-ld` This implements the `Linker::{link_whole_staticlib,link_whole_rlib}` methods for the `WasmLd` linker used on wasm targets. Previously these methods were noops since I think historically `wasm-ld` did not have support for `--whole-archive` but nowadays it does, so the flags are passed through.
`#[test]`: Point at return type if `Termination` bound is unsatisfied Together with rust-lang#103142 (already merged) this fully fixes rust-lang#50291. I don't consider my current solution of changing a few spans “here and there” very clean since the failed obligation is a `FunctionArgumentObligation` and we point at a type instead of a function argument. If you agree with me on this point, I can offer to keep the spans of the existing nodes and instead inject `let _: AssertRetTyIsTermination<$ret_ty>;` (type to be defined in `libtest`) similar to `AssertParamIsEq` etc. used by some built-in derive-macros. I haven't tried that approach yet though and cannot promise that it would actually work out or be “cleaner” for that matter. ``@rustbot`` label A-libtest A-diagnostics r? ``@estebank``
…-parentheses, r=estebank Fix unused lint and parser caring about spaces to won't produce invalid code Fixes rust-lang#103435
…tebank Suggest calling the instance method of the same name when method not found Fixes rust-lang#103474
Fix broken link in description of error code E0706 Corresponding subsection in async book is `07.05` not `07.06`. The information on the linked page is the same so it may be reasonable to remove the whole sentence.
prevent uninitialized access in black_box for zero-sized-types Don't read the pointer location in black_box for zero sized types, just emit a memory clobber instead. Addresses rust-lang#103304 when rust is build against LLVM at HEAD. Zulip thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187780-t-compiler.2Fwg-llvm/topic/.28with.20llvm.20at.20HEAD.29.3A.20msan.20error.20in.20core.3A.3Ahint.3A.3Ablack_box
…ble-trait, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: use javascript to layout notable traits popups Fixes rust-lang#102576 Preview: https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/102576-js-notable-trait/std/iter/trait.Iterator.html#method.step_by ## Before ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/200432713-23aa8d49-ba2b-469f-9eab-089e0c174039.png) ## After ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1593513/200432735-edd5b53d-e99d-4fc5-9410-8a79e0efdc9d.png)
…n514 Retry binding TCP Socket in remote-test-server This allows retrying binding TCP Socket multiple times. This is useful when using emulators as network might not be available in the beginning. This was orignally implemented in rust-lang#100316 Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 11, 2022
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 11, 2022
⌛ Testing commit 4fc9d1c with merge d1cc7cdb6274e37aeb409c0fe8e0dc96c60b1b81... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Nov 11, 2022
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#[must_use]
annotation onasync fn
as also affecting theFuture::Output
#100633 (Consider#[must_use]
annotation onasync fn
as also affecting theFuture::Output
)+whole-archive
modifier forwasm-ld
#102215 (Implement the+whole-archive
modifier forwasm-ld
)#[test]
: Point at return type ifTermination
bound is unsatisfied #103445 (#[test]
: Point at return type ifTermination
bound is unsatisfied)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup