Do not consider elaborated projection predicates for objects in new solver #109675
+37
−9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
object-heck
branch
from
8fe9632 to
d62238d
Compare
|
@bors r=lcnr rollup (only affects new solver) |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#107387 (Use random `HashMap` keys on Hermit) - rust-lang#109511 (Make `EvalCtxt`'s `infcx` private) - rust-lang#109554 (Suggest ..= when someone tries to create an overflowing range) - rust-lang#109675 (Do not consider elaborated projection predicates for objects in new solver) - rust-lang#109693 (Remove ~const from alloc) - rust-lang#109700 (Lint against escape sequences in Fluent files) - rust-lang#109716 (Move `mir::Field` → `abi::FieldIdx`) - rust-lang#109726 (rustdoc: Don't strip crate module) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Object types have projection bounds which are elaborated during astconv. There's no need to do it again for projection goals, since that'll give us duplicate projection candidatesd that are distinct up to regions due to the fact that we canonicalize every region to a separate variable. See quick example below the break for a better explanation.
Discussed this with lcnr, and adding a stop-gap until we get something like intersection region constraints (or modify canonicalization to canonicalize identical regions to the same canonical regions) -- after which, this will hopefully not matter and may be removed.
r? @lcnr
See
tests/ui/traits/new-solver/more-object-bound.rs:Consider a goal:
<dyn Iter<'a, ()> as Iterator>::Item = &'a ().After canonicalization:
<dyn Iter<'!0r, (), Item = '!1r ()> as Iterator>::Item == &!'2r ()<dyn Iter<'!0r, (), Item = '?!r ()> as Iterator>::Item == &!'1r (). This gives us one region constraint:!'1r == !'2r.<dyn Iter<'!0r, (), Item = '!1r ()> as Iterator>::Item == &!'0r (). This gives us one region constraint:!'0r == !'2r.