Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating Wake example to use new 'pin!' macro #110796

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2023

Conversation

madsravn
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #109965

I have already had this reviewed and approved here: #110026 . But because I had some git issues and chose the "nuke it" option as my solution it didn't get merged. I nuked it too quickly. I am sorry for trouble of reviewing twice.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 25, 2023

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 25, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 25, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 25, 2023

📌 Commit 3b196fb has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 25, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2023
…lacrum

Updating Wake example to use new 'pin!' macro

Closes: rust-lang#109965

I have already had this reviewed and approved here: rust-lang#110026 . But because I had some git issues and chose the "nuke it" option as my solution it didn't get merged. I nuked it too quickly. I am sorry for trouble of reviewing twice.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#110556 (Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `explicit_item_bounds`)
 - rust-lang#110615 (Add `impl_tag!` macro to implement `Tag` for tagged pointer easily)
 - rust-lang#110649 (Fix no_global_oom_handling build)
 - rust-lang#110671 (Consider polarity in new solver)
 - rust-lang#110783 (Fix ICE on --print=... i/o errors)
 - rust-lang#110796 (Updating Wake example to use new 'pin!' macro)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 77752a0 into rust-lang:master Apr 25, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update Wake example to use pin! macro instead of Box::pin
5 participants