Skip to content

Conversation

@ro-tex
Copy link
Contributor

@ro-tex ro-tex commented Sep 4, 2025

We are seeing a lot of CPU and memory usage on Staging Mainnet, therefore we're reverting this change, so it doesn't make it into an official core build. We'll keep working on it until we're happy with the performance and then we'll bring it back.

Reverted PRs:
#18843 - original implementation
#19079 - revert due to a flaky test
#19086 - fix the test and reapply
#19105 - handle an edge case

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2025

I see you updated files related to core. Please run pnpm changeset in the root directory to add a changeset as well as in the text include at least one of the following tags:

  • #added For any new functionality added.
  • #breaking_change For any functionality that requires manual action for the node to boot.
  • #bugfix For bug fixes.
  • #changed For any change to the existing functionality.
  • #db_update For any feature that introduces updates to database schema.
  • #deprecation_notice For any upcoming deprecation functionality.
  • #internal For changesets that need to be excluded from the final changelog.
  • #nops For any feature that is NOP facing and needs to be in the official Release Notes for the release.
  • #removed For any functionality/config that is removed.
  • #updated For any functionality that is updated.
  • #wip For any change that is not ready yet and external communication about it should be held off till it is feature complete.

@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

@ro-tex ro-tex marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2025 13:19
@ro-tex ro-tex requested review from a team as code owners September 4, 2025 13:19
@pavel-raykov
Copy link
Collaborator

We are seeing a lot of CPU and memory usage on Staging Mainnet, therefore we're reverting this change, so it doesn't make it into an official core build. We'll keep working on it until we're happy with the performance and then we'll bring it back.

Requires

Supports

Please include in the description which PRs are reverted.

@JoshC2k
Copy link

JoshC2k commented Sep 4, 2025

For context, this is a duplicate of my PR from yesterday (#19209) as I don't have the necessary permissions to contribute to this repo yet (ticket pending).

@ro-tex ro-tex added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit ecf2a46 Sep 4, 2025
150 of 151 checks passed
@ro-tex ro-tex deleted the ivo/revert_obs_loop branch September 4, 2025 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants