Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve search in document #160

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mgiroday
Copy link
Contributor

@mgiroday mgiroday commented Sep 2, 2024

@mgiroday mgiroday requested a review from narnaud September 2, 2024 05:11
Copy link
Member

@narnaud narnaud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

THere's an architecture issue here:

  • the API you introduced in Core only emit signals, so that's not something a user can use from a script
    Yes. This was the wrong way to do it indeed. I have introduced a 'setFindWidget(...)' which function which is called from the MainWindow.
    Fixed. Thank you.
  • HighlightSearchDelegate shouldn't be in Core, but gui only <-- Fixed. Thank you.

IMO there shouldn't be any specific changes into Core, only gui. So we need a way for the FindWidget to work on views instead of working on document. Meaning you need some sort of interfaces for the searchable views to call from the FinWidget. Fixed.
Concerning the rc views it is a bit different as we have 3 different views to handle for the search.
So each view has its own search widgets.

I like the idea of the highlight delegate, but don't make the color blue (it's hardly readable for me), maybe use bold and/or underline. <--- Fixed (using bold - looks better indeed). Thank you.

I'm not sure we want to do replace on ts and ui view yet, so maybe have a way to hide this part for now when on the ts or ui view. Fixed (I saved the find and replace code locally in case we want to add this feature at some point) .

Last thing, when I press escape and hide the find widget, I would expect to reset the search delegate.
Yep - did not notice that - fixed. Thank you.

@mgiroday mgiroday force-pushed the improve-search-in-document branch 3 times, most recently from 5a51860 to 15b61a5 Compare September 10, 2024 09:04
@mgiroday
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments fixed. Ready for review.

Copy link
Member

@narnaud narnaud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For now, don't do anything on the rcfileview.
In term of usability, I would like to use the same find widget as the rest, I need to figure out how to do that though. So let's remove that out.

src/gui/findwidget.ui Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/findwidget.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/highlightsearchdelegate.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/qttsview.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/qttsview.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/qttsview.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/qtuiview.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/qtuiview.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gui/qtuiview.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Fixes tasks:
QtUiDocument
QtTsDocument
RCDocument text view
RCDocument central view
RCDocument left tree
@mgiroday mgiroday force-pushed the improve-search-in-document branch from 15b61a5 to a9473c3 Compare October 23, 2024 11:26
@mgiroday
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgiroday commented Oct 23, 2024

Comments fixed. Ready for review.
Note: I have reverted all changes related to rcfileview as you have mentioned above.

@narnaud
Copy link
Member

narnaud commented Oct 31, 2024

I did some changes, but apparently I can't edit this PR.
So the new PR is #215
Thank you Michel, nice starting point for me.

@narnaud narnaud closed this Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants