-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 505
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove anago #1765
Remove anago #1765
Conversation
@saschagrunert: Adding label: Reasons for blocking this PR:[Changes to certain release tools can affect our ability to test, build, and release Kubernetes. This PR must be explicitly approved by SIG Release repo admins.] Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
😮 omg. The day has come. |
OMGOMGOMG |
This is the patch everyone is waiting for! We finally remove `anago` as well as all referencing scripts and documentation to it. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@suse.com>
Everything looks good… |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
🚀
/lgtm !! 🚀 🚀 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really nice work @saschagrunert and others :)
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hasheddan, puerco, saschagrunert, xmudrii The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is the patch everyone is waiting for! ❤️ We finally remove
anago
as well as all referencing scripts and documentation to it.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Closes #1673
Special notes for your reviewer:
Requires
#1763,#1764,#1769as well as#1789Requires manual testing, too.
/hold
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?