Skip to content

Conversation

@Dunqing
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing commented Oct 21, 2025

Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Oct 21, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-formatter Area - Formatter label Oct 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the C-enhancement Category - New feature or request label Oct 21, 2025
@Dunqing Dunqing marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 01:03
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 10-21-feat_formatter_wrap_parenthesis_for_assignmentexpression_that_are_inside_computedmemberexpression branch from f4c99f6 to b615b0a Compare October 21, 2025 01:03
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 21, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #14834 will not alter performance

Comparing 10-21-feat_formatter_wrap_parenthesis_for_assignmentexpression_that_are_inside_computedmemberexpression (b615b0a) with 10-21-fix_formatter_correct_handling_of_ignore_comment_for_tsuniontype_and_tsmappedtype (5f4b01f)

Summary

✅ 33 untouched
⏩ 4 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@Dunqing Dunqing requested a review from leaysgur October 21, 2025 04:30
@leaysgur leaysgur added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Oct 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

leaysgur commented Oct 21, 2025

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 10-21-fix_formatter_correct_handling_of_ignore_comment_for_tsuniontype_and_tsmappedtype branch from 5f4b01f to 88fb768 Compare October 21, 2025 04:38
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from overlookmotel as a code owner October 21, 2025 04:38
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 10-21-feat_formatter_wrap_parenthesis_for_assignmentexpression_that_are_inside_computedmemberexpression branch from b615b0a to aa024d9 Compare October 21, 2025 04:38
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Oct 21, 2025
Base automatically changed from 10-21-fix_formatter_correct_handling_of_ignore_comment_for_tsuniontype_and_tsmappedtype to main October 21, 2025 04:44
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit aa024d9 into main Oct 21, 2025
21 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 10-21-feat_formatter_wrap_parenthesis_for_assignmentexpression_that_are_inside_computedmemberexpression branch October 21, 2025 04:46
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025
graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
## [0.7.0] - 2025-10-21

### 🚀 Features

- 6dfcd80 oxfmt: Search both .json and .jsonc config file (#14848) (leaysgur)
- aa024d9 formatter: Wrap parenthesis for `AssignmentExpression` that are inside `ComputedMemberExpression` (#14834) (Dunqing)

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

- 88fb768 formatter: Correct handling of ignore comment for `TSUnionType` and `TSMappedType` (#14824) (Dunqing)
- f7727c7 formatter: Ignore comment doesn't work for the expression statement (#14817) (Dunqing)
- 7a420a1 oxfmt: Handle `.d.ts` file correctly (#14835) (leaysgur)

### 🚜 Refactor

- 6fa7420 oxfmt: Use custom ignore builder (#14850) (leaysgur)
- 9d914a3 formatter: Improve comments handling (#14816) (Dunqing)
- f52863d formatter: Improve handling of type cast node (#14815) (Dunqing)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-formatter Area - Formatter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants