Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #82663

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #82663

merged 18 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Mar 1, 2021

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

ssomers and others added 18 commits February 21, 2021 19:06
This was introduced as part of the MVP for `download-rustc`.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work very well:

- Steps are ignored by default, which makes it easy to leave out a step
that should be built. For example, the MVP forgot to enable any tests,
so it was *only* possible to build locally.
- It didn't work correctly even when it was enabled: calling
  `builder.ensure()` would completely ignore the constant and rebuild the
  step anyway. This has no obvious fix since `ensure()` has to return a
  `Step::Output`.

Instead, this handles `download-rustc` in `impl Step for Rustc` and
`impl Step for Std`, which to my knowledge are the only build steps that
don't first go through `impl Step for Sysroot` (`Rustc` is used for
the `rustc-dev` component).

See rust-lang#79540 (comment)
and rust-lang#81930 for further context.

Here are some example runs with these changes and `download-rustc`
enabled:

```
$ x.py build src/tools/clippy
Building stage1 tool clippy-driver (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 1m 09s
Building stage1 tool cargo-clippy (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.11s
$ x.py test src/tools/clippy
Updating only changed submodules
Submodules updated in 0.01 seconds
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
Building stage1 tool clippy-driver (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.09s
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.28s
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 15.26s
     Running build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/clippy_driver-8b407b140e0aa91c
test result: ok. 592 passed; 0 failed; 3 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
$ x.py build src/tools/rustdoc
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 41.28s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:41
$ x.py test src/test/rustdoc-ui
Building stage0 tool compiletest (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.12s
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.10s
test result: ok. 105 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 8.15s
$ x.py build compiler/rustc
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:00
```

Note a few things:

- Clippy depends on stage1 rustc-dev artifacts, but rustc didn't have to
  be recompiled. Instead, the artifacts were copied automatically.
- All steps are always enabled. There is no danger of forgetting a step,
  since only the entrypoints have to handle `download-rustc`.
- Building the compiler (`compiler/rustc`) automatically does no work.
Previously, if you denied the old name of a renamed lint, it would warn
about using the new name, but otherwise do nothing. Now, it will behave
the same as if you'd used the new name.
Reading the discussion of this feature, I gained the mistaken impression that neither `set` nor `get` blocked, and thus calling `get` immediately after `set` was not guaranteed to succeed. It turns out that `set` *does* block, guaranteeing that the cell contains a value once `set` returns. This change updates the documentation to state that explicitly.
Improve error messages for musl-libdir and wasi-root keys. Previously
the parser would panic with `unwrap()`. Now it prints

      Target "wasm32-wasi" does not have a "wasi-root" key

(and similar for the `musl-libdir` field, which is used in target that
use musl)

Also update comments around wasi-root field to make it clear that the
field is only valid in wasm32-wasi target and needs to be moved to a
`[target.wasm32-wasi]` section to be valid.

Fixes rust-lang#82317
…=Mark-Simulacrum

BTreeMap: correct node size test case for choices of B

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
config.toml parsing error improvements

Improve error messages for musl-libdir and wasi-root keys. Previously
the parser would panic with `unwrap()`. Now it prints

      Target "wasm32-wasi" does not have a "wasi-root" key

(and similar for the `musl-libdir` field, which is used in target that
use musl)

Also update comments around wasi-root field to make it clear that the
field is only valid in wasm32-wasi target and needs to be moved to a
`[target.wasm32-wasi]` section to be valid.

Fixes rust-lang#82317

---

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…imulacrum

Remove `ENABLE_DOWNLOAD_RUSTC` constant

`ENABLE_DOWNLOAD_RUSTC` was introduced as part of the MVP for `download-rustc` as a way not to rebuild artifacts that have already been downloaded. Unfortunately, it doesn't work very well:

- Steps are ignored by default, which makes it easy to leave out a step
that should be built. For example, the MVP forgot to enable any tests,
so it was only possible to *build* locally.
- It didn't work correctly even when it was enabled: calling
  `builder.ensure()` would completely ignore the constant and rebuild the
  step anyway. This has no obvious fix since `ensure()` has to return a
  `Step::Output`.

Instead, this handles `download-rustc` in `impl Step for Rustc` and
`impl Step for Std`, which to my knowledge are the only build steps that
don't first go through `impl Step for Sysroot` (`Rustc` is used for
the `rustc-dev` component).

See rust-lang#79540 (comment) and rust-lang#81930 for further context.

Here are some example runs with these changes and `download-rustc`
enabled:

```
$ x.py build src/tools/clippy
Building stage1 tool clippy-driver (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 1m 09s
Building stage1 tool cargo-clippy (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.11s
$ x.py test src/tools/clippy
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
Building stage1 tool clippy-driver (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.09s
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.28s
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 15.26s
     Running build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/clippy_driver-8b407b140e0aa91c
test result: ok. 592 passed; 0 failed; 3 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
$ x.py build src/tools/rustdoc
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 41.28s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:41
$ x.py test src/test/rustdoc-ui
Building stage0 tool compiletest (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.12s
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
    Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.10s
test result: ok. 105 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 8.15s
$ x.py build compiler/rustc
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:00
```

Note a few things:

- Clippy depends on stage1 rustc-dev artifacts, but rustc didn't have to
  be recompiled. Instead, the artifacts were copied automatically.
- All steps are always enabled. There is no danger of forgetting a step,
  since only the entrypoints have to handle `download-rustc`.
- Building the compiler (`compiler/rustc`) automatically does no work.

Helps with rust-lang#81930.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…hearth

Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints

Previously, if you denied the old name of a renamed lint, it would warn
about using the new name, but otherwise do nothing. Now, it will behave
the same as if you'd used the new name.

Fixes rust-lang#82615.

r? `@ehuss`
Fix typos in rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate
Clarify that SyncOnceCell::set blocks.

Reading the discussion of this feature, I gained the mistaken impression that neither `set` nor `get` blocked, and thus calling `get` immediately after `set` was not guaranteed to succeed. It turns out that `set` *does* block, guaranteeing that the cell contains a value once `set` returns. This change updates the documentation to state that explicitly.

Happy to adjust the wording as desired.
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 1, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Mar 1, 2021

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2021

📌 Commit 9a86a72 has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 1, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 9a86a72 with merge 80f8b0b00ef65bd8a549cb5019eb5a11bde7beb3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 1, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Mar 1, 2021

MacOS failed without a build log 😕

@bors retry

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 1, 2021
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 1, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 9a86a72 with merge 4f20caa...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 1, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jyn514
Pushing 4f20caa to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants