Skip to content

Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints #82620

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2021
Merged

Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints #82620

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2021

Conversation

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Feb 28, 2021

Previously, if you denied the old name of a renamed lint, it would warn
about using the new name, but otherwise do nothing. Now, it will behave
the same as if you'd used the new name.

Fixes #82615.

r? @ehuss

@jyn514 jyn514 added A-lints Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 28, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 28, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@jyn514 jyn514 mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2021
Merged
@jyn514
Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints
df156c1 
Previously, if you denied the old name of a renamed lint, it would warn
about using the new name, but otherwise do nothing. Now, it will behave
the same as if you'd used the new name.
@jyn514 jyn514 force-pushed the apply-renamed-lints branch from f27f61d to df156c1 Compare February 28, 2021 06:04
camelid
camelid reviewed Feb 28, 2021
View reviewed changes
ehuss
ehuss approved these changes Mar 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems good to me, but I don't feel comfortable approving it. Can you request a review from someone on the compiler team?

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Mar 1, 2021

Hmm, maybe r? @Manishearth ?

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Manishearth and unassigned ehuss Mar 1, 2021
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 1, 2021

📌 Commit df156c1 has been approved by Manishearth

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 1, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2021
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2021
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#82663 - jyn514:rollup-xh3cb0c, r=jyn514
4f20caa 
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#81210 (BTreeMap: correct node size test case for choices of B)
 - rust-lang#82360 (config.toml parsing error improvements)
 - rust-lang#82428 (Update mdbook)
 - rust-lang#82480 (Remove `ENABLE_DOWNLOAD_RUSTC` constant)
 - rust-lang#82578 (Add some diagnostic items for Clippy)
 - rust-lang#82620 (Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints)
 - rust-lang#82635 (Fix typos in rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate)
 - rust-lang#82645 (Clarify that SyncOnceCell::set blocks.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6808802 into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Mar 1, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the apply-renamed-lints branch March 1, 2021 23:55
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80527 - jyn514:rustdoc-lints, r=GuillaumeGomez
7837222 
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in

- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though).
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
- Move lint machinery into a separate file
- Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro

Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786.

## Current status

This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2021
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80527 - jyn514:rustdoc-lints, r=GuillaumeGomez
2158634 
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in

- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though).
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
- Move lint machinery into a separate file
- Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro

Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786.

## Current status

This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80527 - jyn514:rustdoc-lints, r=GuillaumeGomez
4e02105 
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in

- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though).
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
- Move lint machinery into a separate file
- Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro

Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786.

## Current status

This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2021
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80527 - jyn514:rustdoc-lints, r=GuillaumeGomez
ea7c3e7 
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in

- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though).
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
- Move lint machinery into a separate file
- Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro

Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786.

## Current status

This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2021
@JohnTitor
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80527 - jyn514:rustdoc-lints, r=GuillaumeGomez
7619837 
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in

- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though).
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
- Move lint machinery into a separate file
- Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro

Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786.

## Current status

This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2021
@JohnTitor
Rollup merge of rust-lang#80527 - jyn514:rustdoc-lints, r=GuillaumeGomez
f898aa3 
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in

- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though).
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
- Move lint machinery into a separate file
- Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro

Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786.

## Current status

This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
@jyn514 jyn514 mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@camelid camelid camelid left review comments

@ehuss ehuss ehuss approved these changes

@Manishearth Manishearth Manishearth approved these changes

Assignees

@Manishearth Manishearth

Labels

A-lints Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.52.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Renamed lints not honored in attributes

8 participants

@jyn514 @rust-log-analyzer @Manishearth @bors @ehuss @camelid @rust-highfive @rustbot