-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Syntax documentation + new /docs directory #111
Conversation
Obviously this is a work in progress, so things are missing. Please add your comments keeping this in mind. I thought about doing this via docstrings, but I think a separate documentation, for non-programmers, is a valuable addition. I want to keep it as minimalistic as possible, to be helpful as a quick reference guide, and easy to use alongside the existing tutorial. I'm trying to avoid long paragraphs of text. |
d7c3e6b
to
09fb513
Compare
@slightlynybbled This could also be a place for the documentation you are missing, as I described in #95 (comment). What do you think? |
That's my intention with the |
I see that you are generating a markdown-based documentation. That is a great start and would certainly be a place to put the 'gotchas' that documentation typically contains. What is 1yr vision for documentation? |
3f9cda7
to
f347dac
Compare
I will have to think about it and read up on these systems before I choose. Perhaps we can open a new issue to discuss this? |
f5b2f91
to
93a00cf
Compare
What are your thoughts on including comprehensive documentation (and possibly snippets from the other markdown files) in the repo wiki, so it's easily browseable by first-time users? The markdown files look great, but it would be nice to either have a docs folder, a github-pages site, or a wiki with them for accessibility. |
|
While there are a couple of open to-do's, the syntax description has reached a stage where I'm happy with the information that's included. It is rather dense, since it's not meant as a gentle intro, but as a reference guide. I believe most of the WireViz syntax itself is described without any glaring omissions. Please have a read and provide feedback if
|
b80ac0e
to
b0ecbae
Compare
## Connector attributes | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
<str> : # unique connector designator/name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the lexical item designator defined in more detail? Are there some limitations?
- Legal characters (including space).
- How can any illegal characters be quoted?
- Any limits on the number of characters?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably a very deep rabbit hole, with all kinds of exceptions:
- numbers (without letters) are accepted, but need to go in quotes so they are parsed as strings
- spaces are OK
- some special YAML characters (
-
,:
and others) can be used by putting the string in quotes - some characters will be accepted, but
- might not show up in the graphical output
- might mess with the BOM export
- some obscure cases might throw errors
Honestly for now I would leave the explanation as-is, and let the user figure it out.
I do agree that it merits a more detailed description, but I would leave that for a later date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this connector designator (and similar for cables) currently is used directly to name the Graphviz node, it must be case insensitive unique within the union of connectors and cables in the harness to avoid reference mix-ups similar to those discovered in #160.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to leave it as-is now, hopefully fix #160 soon and then add "case-sensitive" to the syntax description.
Otherwise it's a confusing mix... "It's case-sensitive for Python but still please treat it as case-insensitive to avoid GraphViz issues 😅 "
type: <str> | ||
subtype: <str> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Same comment as above: Are there some limitations about a string like this?
- If a designator can be any string, then these descriptions can be combined.
- If the only limitations are what can be specified in YAML, then a link to a description, might be enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keep simple for now, so this won't be changed at the moment.
Since it's a string inside a YAML file, adherence to the YAML spec is implicit. I wouldn't add links to what YAML treats as an int
or float
here either...
14cbe7a
to
663833b
Compare
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
caption: <str> # text to display below the image | ||
width: <int> # range: 1~65535; unit: ??? | ||
height: <int> # range: 1~65535; unit: ??? | ||
fixedsize: <bool> # ??? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest removing this here as it is now explained in the advanced usage file (see link above).
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
scale: <str> # scaling behavior; possible values: | ||
# false does not scale the image | ||
# true scale image proportionally | ||
# to fit within given max. width and height | ||
# width scale image proportionally to given width | ||
# height scale image proportionally to given height | ||
# both resize to given width and height |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest removing this here as it is now explained in the advanced usage file (see link above).
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
Connectors accept multiline strings in the `type`, `subtype` and `notes` attributes. | ||
Cables accept multiline strings in the `type` and `notes` attributes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Include also these for both connectors and cables: manufacturer
, mpn
, image.caption
As the list is almost identical for both connectors and cables, I suggest combining their descriptions like this:
Connectors and cables accept multiline strings in these attributes: manufacturer
, mpn
, notes
, image.caption
, type
and subtype
(the latter doesn't exist for cables).
Alternatively, we could consider using something like <mlstr>
as type where a multiline string is accepted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively, we could consider using something like
<mlstr>
as type where a multiline string is accepted.
After adding semanticly named type aliases in PR #163, I now suggest we do something similar here. If PR #163 is accepted, I suggest we use the same type names here as in DataClasses.py
. See also #163 (comment) about how PR #164 might affect this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively, we could consider using something like
<mlstr>
as type where a multiline string is accepted.After adding semanticly named type aliases in PR #163, I now suggest we do something similar here. If PR #163 is accepted, I suggest we use the same type names here as in
DataClasses.py
. See also #163 (comment) about how PR #164 might affect this.
Let's think about this in the future, once those PRs are actually merged :) For now, a list of multiline-supporting attributes is enough.
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
|
||
## Inheritance | ||
|
||
Add link to YAML spec. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this link to YAML explanations a good candidate? https://learnxinyminutes.com/docs/yaml/
It seems to cover what the users might need (and a bit more), but it is not limited to inheritance, so the section header might be changed to General YAML tutorial
or something like that. If you prefer a link to inheritance only, then this archived article might be a very simple candidate: https://web.archive.org/web/20130213112648/http://blog.101ideas.cz/posts/dry-your-yaml-files.html
A related issue is the main section templates
as used in demo02.yml, ex05.yml, and ex06.yml. This main section is not explained here probably because it is ignored by the WireViz parser. The templates
name is just a dummy placeholder for defining a list of templates without actually including them in the harness.
I suggest documenting the templates
main section as part of the syntax (supporting the usage in example files) even though the user can actually name it anything that is not interpreted as something else.
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
# pinout information | ||
# at least one of the following must be specified | ||
# if more than one is specified, list lenghts must match pincount, and each other |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is actually allowed to set pincount > len(pins)
and it does make sense, e.g. in cases like those I suggested in #138 where the remaining pins appear as hidden.
## Connector attributes | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
<str> : # unique connector designator/name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this connector designator (and similar for cables) currently is used directly to name the Graphviz node, it must be case insensitive unique within the union of connectors and cables in the harness to avoid reference mix-ups similar to those discovered in #160.
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
Connectors accept multiline strings in the `type`, `subtype` and `notes` attributes. | ||
Cables accept multiline strings in the `type` and `notes` attributes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively, we could consider using something like
<mlstr>
as type where a multiline string is accepted.
After adding semanticly named type aliases in PR #163, I now suggest we do something similar here. If PR #163 is accepted, I suggest we use the same type names here as in DataClasses.py
. See also #163 (comment) about how PR #164 might affect this.
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
|
||
## Inheritance | ||
|
||
Add link to YAML spec. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also mention here how templates can be reused between harnesses by defining them in a separate YAML file that can be included with the --prepend-file
command line option?
docs/syntax.md
Outdated
Connectors (both regular, and auto-generated), cables, and wires of a bundle are automatically added to the BOM, | ||
unless the `ignore_in_bom` attribute is set to `true`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggesting additions to Contribution Guidelines
fdccc8c
to
a48aa45
Compare
I've included a lot of your suggestions, and commented on the ones where I think it's worth leaving as-is for now and expanding in the future, so as not to overthink it in this still early stage :) I hope you agree on these points, looking forward to finishing up and merging the current version of the docs. |
a48aa45
to
d5ee75e
Compare
If there are no major disagreements, @kvid please give green light to squash and merge :) Otherwise let me know, I've hopefully addressed all your comments. Thanks! |
I'm sorry, but I don't have a PC where I am right now. I only have a phone with a small screen. I have to wait until later today before I'm able to read your latest effort properly. However, I do know about a few issues:
|
I can't find any reaction (comment or code change) related to my #111 (comment) - did you consider this one? |
11443e9
to
8eda5d7
Compare
Wow, that's an exhaustive list, amazing! When I started the changelog, I thought I'd just include the most relevant changes, but perhaps it's good practice to include the complete list. Thanks. I will do this tomorrow.
I've updated |
8eda5d7
to
ad00747
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Be aware that #111 (comment) has been edited since your last message in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I overlooked this one yesterday.
I've added all the issue/PR links you provided. Hopefully we can close this now, ideally I'd like to package up v0.2 today since I have some time. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for accepting almost all of my suggestions. And thank you for the effort creating this nice documentation. Too many projects neglect documentation in the early stages of a project.
Please have a look at #178 in case I'm forgetting something... I'm trying to make a foolproof checklist, which I can then reuse on future releases, so feel free to add your thoughts. I'm excited to finish this PR but will wait until your final 👍 . |
- Create `docs/` directory - Add syntax description (`syntax.md`) - Track changes since first release (`CHANGELOG.md`) - Expand contribution guidelines (`CONTRIBUTING.md`) - Improve main readme (`README.md`) - Add documentation for build script (`buildscript.md`)
68d1d49
to
40f9edf
Compare
I suggest adding a minor entry to the change log immediately after merging any PR. It should be much easier when it is fresh in mind, instead of searching all PRs just before a release. 😃 BTW, you just merged my PR #177 in case that fits into one of the change log items - perhaps the item about "Improve HTML output".
Not at all. A lot of minor suggestions only. You have put everything together.
|
🤦 Yes, this should become standard practice. Time for a quick force-push to |
Closes #107.
See current status in rendered form here.