Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-22270. master's jmx.clusterRequests could be negative in branch-1 #164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2019
Merged

HBASE-22270. master's jmx.clusterRequests could be negative in branch-1 #164

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2019

Conversation

puleya77
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
0 reexec 47 Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
0 findbugs 0 Findbugs executables are not available.
+1 hbaseanti 0 Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 @author 0 The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-0 test4tests 0 The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ branch-1 Compile Tests _
+1 mvninstall 115 branch-1 passed
+1 compile 40 branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_202
+1 compile 41 branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_211
+1 checkstyle 83 branch-1 passed
+1 shadedjars 170 branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 javadoc 30 branch-1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_202
+1 javadoc 39 branch-1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_211
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 mvninstall 105 the patch passed
+1 compile 39 the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_202
+1 javac 39 the patch passed
+1 compile 42 the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_211
+1 javac 42 the patch passed
+1 checkstyle 82 the patch passed
+1 whitespace 0 The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 shadedjars 167 patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 hadoopcheck 100 Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.7.4.
+1 javadoc 29 the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_202
+1 javadoc 39 the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_211
_ Other Tests _
-1 unit 7910 hbase-server in the patch failed.
+1 asflicense 27 The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
9189
Reason Tests
Failed junit tests hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.TestVisibilityLabelsWithACL
hadoop.hbase.client.TestAdmin2
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce base: https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-164/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #164
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs shadedjars hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile
uname Linux 8480882a4179 4.4.0-144-generic #170~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 18 15:02:05 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
git revision branch-1 / 539de1c
maven version: Apache Maven 3.0.5
Default Java 1.7.0_211
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:1.8.0_202 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_211
unit https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-164/1/artifact/out/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
Test Results https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-164/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3595 (vs. ulimit of 10000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-164/1/console
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.9.0 http://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@apurtell apurtell self-requested a review April 24, 2019 21:17
@apurtell
Copy link
Contributor

The test failures are unrelated. Merging.
Thanks for the contribution @puleya77

@apurtell apurtell merged commit edc30fc into apache:branch-1 Apr 24, 2019
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
…-1 (#164)

Signed-off-by: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2019
…-1 (#164)

Signed-off-by: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
This was referenced Aug 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants