Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Global configuration for functions #901

Open
Tracked by #2026
lance opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 7 comments
Open
Tracked by #2026

Global configuration for functions #901

lance opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/enhancement lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@lance
Copy link
Member

lance commented Mar 15, 2022

Allow the user to set global configuration options, for example the image registry, with func config --global.

@lance lance added the MVP label Mar 15, 2022
@lance lance changed the title Func Config Improvements Global configuration for functions Mar 15, 2022
@nainaz
Copy link

nainaz commented Mar 16, 2022

Context

Enterprises and developers using the same configuration parameters that may be different from the default ones for creating functions currently has to change the values repeatedly. Cluster admin would like to set up the common and standard parameters for the developers

Story

As Dina the developer, I should be able set some global configuration parameters across my machine/cluster so that I can have the same configuration override applied to all my functions and not fiddle with the default ones provided every time.

As cluster admin, I should be able set some global configuration parameters across my machine/cluster so that I can have the developers user the consistent approved configuration values override applied to all functions created in the org 

Acceptance Criteria

GIVEN that I provide the global override of configuration parameter 
WHEN I write and create my functions
THEN globally set configurations should be used rather than the default ones while building and deploying my function.

@lance
Copy link
Member Author

lance commented Nov 15, 2022

/kind epic

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Nov 15, 2022

@lance: The label(s) kind/epic cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

/kind epic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

This was referenced Mar 14, 2023
@lance lance modified the milestones: Release 1.10, Release 1.11 May 16, 2023
@lance lance removed the MVP label May 16, 2023
@lkingland lkingland removed this from the Release 1.11 milestone Jul 18, 2023
@lkingland lkingland removed the Epic Epics to group issues label Oct 15, 2023
@lkingland lkingland mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2023
15 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 6, 2024
@lkingland lkingland removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 21, 2024
@matejvasek
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants
@lance @matejvasek @nainaz @lkingland and others