Charters Meta-issue

[jdumars]

This issue is to help organize the work necessary to move SIG/WG charters forward.

Tracking spreadsheet that was the source for this issue

CHARTERS MERGED:

SIG	Reviewed by	Notes
SIG Auth	@jbeda @philips @michelleN	subprojects being enumerated (ref: kubernetes/community#2525)
SIG Service Catalog	@philips @michelleN	followup to use new charter template
SIG Cloud Provider		reviewed via thread, needs followup to use new charter template
SIG CLI	@pwittrock @bgrant0607 @spiffxp
SIG Instrumentation	@derekwaynecarr @spiffxp
SIG Scalability	@spiffxp @timothysc	tech leads need to be enumerated in sigs.yaml
SIG Cluster Lifecycle	@jbeda @bgrant0607
SIG Node	@philips @bgrant0607
SIG Storage	@philips @quinton-hoole
SIG VMWare	@philips @smarterclayton @spiffxp
SIG Scheduling	@quinton-hoole @derekwaynecarr
SIG IBMCloud	@spiffxp @derekwaynecarr
SIG Testing	@brendandburns @dims
SIG Multicluster	@timothysc @spiffxp
SIG Apps	@bgrant0607 @smarterclayton
SIG Architecture	@jbeda @bgrant0607 (also @smarterclayton @brendandburns )
SIG AWS	@philips @jbeda @spiffxp	under review
SIG Windows	@philips @spiffxp	needs subprojects / areas of code listed
SIG Release	@timothysc @spiffxp
SIG UI	@dims @spiffxp
SIG Nework	@dims @philips
SIG API Machinery	@smarterclayton @bgrant0607
SIG Autoscaling	@spiffxp @brendandburns @michelleN
SIG Contributor Experience	@spiffxp @sarahnovotny

CHARTERS UNDER SC REVIEW:

SIG	Reviewed by	Notes
SIG Docs	@bgrant0607 @jbeda @spiffxp	@pwittrock has picked up 2019-01-15

CHARTERS MERGED WITHOUT/LIMITED SC REVIEW:

SIG	SC liasons	Notes
SIG PM	@sarahnovotny @spiffxp	Many differences from the template needing reconciliation, also no SC review AFAICT, see this PR

CHARTERS WE ARE HOLDING ON:

SIG	Reviewed by	Notes
SIG Azure	@brendandburns @sarahnovotny	was drafted prior to template, intend to fold into SIG Cloud Provider
SIG Big Data	@bgrant0607 @michelleN @spiffxp @timothysc	should be a WG
SIG GCP	@bgrant0607 @sarahnovotny	intend to fold into SIG Cloud Provider
SIG OpenStack	@spiffxp @dims	intend to fold into SIG Cloud Provider

CHARTER ISSUES/RECOMMENDATIONS:

• SIG membership standardized
• Diversity and inclusion statement

TEMPLATE CHANGES REQUESTED:

• Clear direction on how unresponsive chairs are removed, especially when a low number exists - see this comment
• Separation of SIG and Sub-project roles - see this PR
• Something about how leadership lifecycle is managed - see this issue

SIGS TO BE SUNSET:

SIG	Assigned to	Notes
SIG Cluster Ops	@sarahnovotny @michelleN	To be decommissioned per kubernetes/community#2031

[jdumars]

For context, this was discussed at the 6/20/18 meeting and the 6/6/18 meeting

[jdumars]

email sent to steering@ with a link to the new template: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/committee-steering/governance/sig-charter-template.md

Further reference: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/committee-steering/governance

[jdumars]

Re: SIG-VMWare (from the mailing list) -

@quinton-hoole wrote: "I added a comment to the kubernetes/community#2300 The relationship between sig-vmware, and the cloud-provider-vsphere subproject of sig-cloud provider is unclear to me. It seems that the two efforts should be collapsed into the latter (at least for now), or the compelling reasons for not doing so should be explicitly documented and approved."

[jdumars]

Discussed 20180718 https://youtu.be/I6BwkOA9dn4?t=8m50s

[spiffxp]

I just rolled through the description and edited to the best of my ability, but uh, yeah, that was painful, and I'm pretty sure everything after "issues/recommendations" may be out of date because I didn't touch it. Will be discussing during community meeting update today

[spiffxp]

Rolled through and updated again.

[spiffxp]

I reconciled a number of merged charters and reviewer assignments with the spreadsheet we used to initially assign SC reviewers.

[spiffxp]

For charters that have yet to be reviewed, I swapped @quinton-hoole out for @dims. I did the same with the spreadsheet, but for all SIGs regardless of charter status.

[spiffxp]

Updated the issue and spreadhseet based on what I surveyed within kubernetes/community

[spiffxp]

We talked during steering today about potentially just not doing the work of writing a charter if a sig plans to fold into sig cloud provider. Also a question of whether sig big data should actually be a wg instead.

[jdumars]

kubernetes/community#2804 is probably ready for SC review given the lack of feedback

[justaugustus]

• SIG Release charter has merged after review from Aaron and Tim St. Clair - Add SIG Release charter community#2919
• SIG PM charter - next on the list to revise for me; hopefully before KubeCon, worst case, by EOY
• SIG Azure charter - I'm not going to bother refactoring this one, as the time would be better spent getting the SIG rolled under SIG Cloud Provider

[timothysc]

This issue is so old and stale, I'd like to propose that we close it and open a new issue with the current work items remaining.

[timothysc]

I will go through existing charters and see what needs to be changed.