-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 730
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migration to version 11.0 #343
Comments
All the best, thanks for all the efforts put in the OCA modules. |
Hi all, |
Hi All, Cheers. |
Please say which ones and then people can email you if interested. |
@yvaucher Please tag me for modules stock_putaway_product and stock_orderpoint_uom |
Hello, |
Hello, |
There's already a migration in #428 |
we plan on migration partner_location_auto_create |
@BT-kaberer I would say yes, but it should be the PSC / users of that addon who have to judge. You can propose the migration or even the hook and see what reviewers says. Other option for not speeding down the installation time is to put a button on config for doing that job, so it's optional to click on it and the installations doesn't delay. |
Hi, thank you all for great work here! |
Nobody has expressed its interest on migrating them for now. |
Hi @pedrobaeza, thank you for letting me, sir. Looks like I'm the only one so far :) I'm looking for something like this for a long time and can't go back to V10.0 now. Thanks anyway! |
@mustafatoraman : could you please tell me the use case of those 2 modules? there are not much info about how to use them. |
@fanha99, simply they glue UoM and Packaging and allows you to sell products by their package configuration and show packaging as UoM in invoice lines. We sell pool mosaic tiles and each item boxed in different quantities. Instead of calculating manually, we will need something like this to speed up quote process. |
packaging_uom #469 |
Migrating sale_packaging |
Is it |
We are investigating coexistence of both |
Great, I think that at the end both cases are valid and can coexist |
@pedrobaeza account_move_line_product - By @VRodrigo - #354 is already merged By @mreficent - #471 Please, check account_move_line_stock_info - By @mreficent - #472 Please, check packaging_uom - By @jhumfer - #469 Please, check stock_cycle_count - By @lreficent - #484 Please, add to the list stock_demand_estimate - By @mpanarin - #381 that is already migrated and merged Please check stock_inventory_exclude_sublocation - By @lreficent - #478 Please check stock_inventory_lockdown - By @lreficent - #479 stock_orderpoint_automatic_creation - By @andreasdsp - #429 is closed and Supersedes by #502 Please check stock_orderpoint_manual_procurement - By @bodedra - #385 Please, add to the list stock_orderpoint_manual_procurement_uom - By @bodedra - #387 that is already migrated and merged Please check stock_removal_location_by_priority - By @lreficent - #483 Please, add to the list stock_warehouse_orderpoint_stock_info_unreserved - By @mpanarin - #377 that is already migrated and merged |
Do we welcome a new bot ? @emagdalenaC2i @pedrobaeza 😄 |
hehe @emagdalenaC2i has been very effective, but yes, this is always interesting, but the problem is to link each one to the proper module and so on. It requires the same to set something on each PR, and the problem is that people don't maintain up to date the list. @rousseldenis you are one of the main exceptions since you are PSC of these repos. |
@rousseldenis Actually last time I almost passed the Turing test ;-) |
I'm thinking that what we can maybe do is to have a bot that read comments. I have put the RFC in OCA/oca-github-bot#32 |
I will look at all logistics repos soon! |
Hello and thank you for all your organization and coding skills! Please forgive the noob question, but purchase_packaging does not appear in the list above -- does that mean it's ineligible to migrate to v11 for some reason (e.g. obsolete), or just that nobody else has expressed interest? Thanks again! |
@AirMDb this list was based on modules that exist in previous branch. The v10 module wasn't merged at that time. It seems that there is no PR for that module at this moment. Please feel free to do it. |
Please, check stock_change_qty_reason - By @andreasdsp - #417 that is already merged |
Hi, |
Hi, |
@fanha99 @pedrobaeza I am dealing with an 11.0 instance that has duplicate quants still: I don't know how they got there, but they are not getting merged because they have a different in_date, and they are causing duplicate lines in a report. Should I still port the |
Odoo itself duplicates quants in some concurrent update cases. That's not critical anyway. |
There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
If the put-away strategy is None, we also need to compute the odoo standard put-away on that destination. refs OCA#343
Todo
https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-11.0
Modules to migrate
By @VRodrigo - [11.0] [MIG] account move line product: Migration to 11.0 #354By @mreficent - [11.0][MIG] account_move_line_product #471By @kikopeiro - [11.0][MIG] stock_available: Migration to 11.0 #353- By @asaunier - [11.0][MIG] stock_available: Migration to 11.0 #405By @reynaldiyosfino - 11.0 mig stock inventory chatter #424- By @xavierjimenez - [11.0][MIG] stock_inventory_chatter #451By @mpanarin - 11.0 mig stock move location WIP #522By @sebalix - [11.0][MIG] stock_move_location #535By @andreasdsp - 11.0 mig stock orderpoint automatic creation #429By @ValentinVinagre - [11.0][MIG]stock_orderpoint_automatic_creation #502By @fanha99 - [11.0] [MIG] stock_quant_manual_assign #361- By @cubells - [MIG] stock_quant_manual_assign: Migration to 11.0 #508stock_quant_mergeNot needed anymore as now there's no quant fragmentationThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: