Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

web: Revamp the Storage page UI #1104

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024
Merged

web: Revamp the Storage page UI #1104

merged 30 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

dgdavid
Copy link
Contributor

@dgdavid dgdavid commented Mar 19, 2024

As part of the Storage UI changes described at https://github.com/openSUSE/agama/blob/master/doc/storage_ui.md document, this PR aims to merge into master the changes already available in the storage_ui feature branch, which has been already tested and validated. Namely,

joseivanlopez and others added 28 commits March 6, 2024 14:57
- agama.gemspec was renamed, see
  #1056.
- The file name was not updated in the rubocop config.
## Problem

The current result of the storage proposal is presented as a list of
actions, which could make a bit complex to understand the overall
picture of the resulting devices.

That list of actions is going to be replaced by a more visual
representation of the devices. To make this possible, more information
about the devices has to be exported on D-Bus.

* Part of https://trello.com/c/7TTVVquM.

## Solution

Add the following information to D-Bus:

* The list of actions includes the SID of the affected device.
* The partition table exports the unused slots.
* The LVM devices (volume groups, physical volumes and logical volumes)
are exported.
* The block devices includes their start block and also indicates
whether the device is encrypted.
* The staging devices are exported. 

NOTE: This PR goes to a feature branch instead of master.

## Testing

* Added unit tests
* Tested manually
## Problem

More information is required to properly represent the storage proposal
result:

* Device description
* Filesystem label

This is a follow-up of #1071.

## Solution

Add new D-Bus interfaces `Device` , `Partition`, `LVM.LogicalVolume` and
adapt `Filesystem` interface.

This changes require yast/yast-storage-ng#1373.

NOTE: This PR goes to a feature branch instead of master.

## Testing

* Added unit tests
* Tested manually
## Problem

The storage D-Bus API was extended to provide all the information
required for a better representation of the proposal result, see
#1071 and
#1082. The JS storage client has
to be adapted.

## Solution

Adapt the storage client to the changes in the D-Bus API and adapt
`ProposalPage` component to read the information about the devices if
needed.

NOTE: This PR goes to a feature branch instead of master.

## Testing

* Added new unit tests
* Tested manually
- The state about expanded devices can be directly stored in the component.
- There are no unmounts when changing the policy or actions, so there is no
  need of remembering the state of an unmounted component.
- Use description from backend.
- Simplify columns.
## Problem

A new table is going to be added to present the storage result, see
#1088. Having both the table for
configuring the space policy and the table for the result at the same
page is too much.

## Solution

Move the space policy configuration to a popup.

## Screenshots

<details>
<summary>Toggle</summary>


![one](https://github.com/openSUSE/agama/assets/3638289/39733341-3ffa-4ef5-946c-5f9c965fc343)


![another](https://github.com/openSUSE/agama/assets/3638289/daa6fd77-d5a5-47e5-b61c-9d6cee2f982e)

</summary>
</details>
Replace the `Actions` section in the storage proposal for a `Result` one
which presents the proposal result in a more appealing way displaying
how the storage would look after installation instead of just the list
of actions. Among others bits, it hints the user about things like
file-systems are going to be created, resized actions and a subtle
emphasis in deletions, if any.

The full, plain list of actions is now available in a modal dialog
linked right before the new introduced table.
## Problem

After presenting the new storage result, it was suggested to replace the
label indicating the amount of shrunk size by a label indicating the
orignal size before resizing.

## Solution

Replace the label.

## Testing

* Test adapted.
* Tested manually

## Screenshots

![Screenshot from 2024-03-18
10-43-19](https://github.com/openSUSE/agama/assets/1112304/3dfbceea-9a11-4845-b91c-1484c128960b)
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 19, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 74.56% (+0.4%) from 74.145%
when pulling d1b2c94 on storage-ui
into d6c3fc0 on master.

@dgdavid dgdavid requested a review from ancorgs March 19, 2024 13:40
Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we update the changelog(s)?

Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dgdavid dgdavid merged commit 2c81aca into master Mar 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@dgdavid dgdavid deleted the storage-ui branch March 19, 2024 14:50
@imobachgs imobachgs mentioned this pull request May 17, 2024
imobachgs added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Prepare for releasing Agama 8. It includes the following pull requests:

* #884
* #886
* #914
* #918
* #956
* #957
* #958
* #959
* #960
* #961
* #962
* #963
* #964
* #965
* #966
* #969
* #970
* #976
* #977
* #978
* #979
* #980
* #981
* #983
* #984
* #985
* #986
* #988
* #991
* #992
* #995
* #996
* #997
* #999
* #1003
* #1004
* #1006
* #1007
* #1008
* #1009
* #1010
* #1011
* #1012
* #1014
* #1015
* #1016
* #1017
* #1020
* #1022
* #1023
* #1024
* #1025
* #1027
* #1028
* #1029
* #1030
* #1031
* #1032
* #1033
* #1034
* #1035
* #1036
* #1038
* #1039
* #1041
* #1042
* #1043
* #1045
* #1046
* #1047
* #1048
* #1052
* #1054
* #1056
* #1057
* #1060
* #1061
* #1062
* #1063
* #1064
* #1066
* #1067
* #1068
* #1069
* #1071
* #1072
* #1073
* #1074
* #1075
* #1079
* #1080
* #1081
* #1082
* #1085
* #1086
* #1087
* #1088
* #1089
* #1090
* #1091
* #1092
* #1093
* #1094
* #1095
* #1096
* #1097
* #1098
* #1099
* #1100
* #1102
* #1103
* #1104
* #1105
* #1106
* #1109
* #1110
* #1111
* #1112
* #1114
* #1116
* #1117
* #1118
* #1119
* #1120
* #1121
* #1122
* #1123
* #1125
* #1126
* #1127
* #1128
* #1129
* #1130
* #1131
* #1132
* #1133
* #1134
* #1135
* #1136
* #1138
* #1139
* #1140
* #1141
* #1142
* #1143
* #1144
* #1145
* #1146
* #1147
* #1148
* #1149
* #1151
* #1152
* #1153
* #1154
* #1155
* #1156
* #1157
* #1158
* #1160
* #1161
* #1162
* #1163
* #1164
* #1165
* #1166
* #1167
* #1168
* #1169
* #1170
* #1171
* #1172
* #1173
* #1174
* #1175
* #1177
* #1178
* #1180
* #1181
* #1182
* #1183
* #1184
* #1185
* #1187
* #1188
* #1189
* #1190
* #1191
* #1192
* #1193
* #1194
* #1195
* #1196
* #1198
* #1199
* #1200
* #1201
* #1203
* #1204
* #1205
* #1206
* #1207
* #1208
* #1209
* #1210
* #1211
* #1212
* #1213
* #1214
* #1215
* #1216
* #1217
* #1219
* #1220
* #1221
* #1222
* #1223
* #1224
* #1225
* #1226
* #1227
* #1229
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants