Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[web] Fix inconsistencies in storage volumes #1109

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

[web] Fix inconsistencies in storage volumes #1109

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

ancorgs
Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs commented Mar 20, 2024

This fixes #1108, both the problems and the implemented solutions are described there in depth.

Tested manually to check both problems are indeed fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@dgdavid dgdavid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 20, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 74.772% (+0.4%) from 74.346%
when pulling e3da7ea on fix_1108
into 2c81aca on master.

@ancorgs ancorgs merged commit 5406333 into master Mar 20, 2024
2 checks passed
@ancorgs ancorgs deleted the fix_1108 branch March 20, 2024 16:25
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ export default function ProposalPage() {
<ProposalSettingsSection
availableDevices={state.availableDevices}
encryptionMethods={state.encryptionMethods}
volumeTemplates={state.volumeTemplates}
Copy link
Contributor

@dgdavid dgdavid Mar 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In a talk with @imobachgs, we concluded that this kind of errors could be avoid with the type checking. To do so, the volumeTemplates prop should be required and not have a default value. The consumer (ProposalPage in this case) is the responsible of giving the empty array if it's the case.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a comment for bearing it in mind when activating the ts-check for the whole .jsx files.

@imobachgs imobachgs mentioned this pull request May 17, 2024
imobachgs added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
Prepare for releasing Agama 8. It includes the following pull requests:

* #884
* #886
* #914
* #918
* #956
* #957
* #958
* #959
* #960
* #961
* #962
* #963
* #964
* #965
* #966
* #969
* #970
* #976
* #977
* #978
* #979
* #980
* #981
* #983
* #984
* #985
* #986
* #988
* #991
* #992
* #995
* #996
* #997
* #999
* #1003
* #1004
* #1006
* #1007
* #1008
* #1009
* #1010
* #1011
* #1012
* #1014
* #1015
* #1016
* #1017
* #1020
* #1022
* #1023
* #1024
* #1025
* #1027
* #1028
* #1029
* #1030
* #1031
* #1032
* #1033
* #1034
* #1035
* #1036
* #1038
* #1039
* #1041
* #1042
* #1043
* #1045
* #1046
* #1047
* #1048
* #1052
* #1054
* #1056
* #1057
* #1060
* #1061
* #1062
* #1063
* #1064
* #1066
* #1067
* #1068
* #1069
* #1071
* #1072
* #1073
* #1074
* #1075
* #1079
* #1080
* #1081
* #1082
* #1085
* #1086
* #1087
* #1088
* #1089
* #1090
* #1091
* #1092
* #1093
* #1094
* #1095
* #1096
* #1097
* #1098
* #1099
* #1100
* #1102
* #1103
* #1104
* #1105
* #1106
* #1109
* #1110
* #1111
* #1112
* #1114
* #1116
* #1117
* #1118
* #1119
* #1120
* #1121
* #1122
* #1123
* #1125
* #1126
* #1127
* #1128
* #1129
* #1130
* #1131
* #1132
* #1133
* #1134
* #1135
* #1136
* #1138
* #1139
* #1140
* #1141
* #1142
* #1143
* #1144
* #1145
* #1146
* #1147
* #1148
* #1149
* #1151
* #1152
* #1153
* #1154
* #1155
* #1156
* #1157
* #1158
* #1160
* #1161
* #1162
* #1163
* #1164
* #1165
* #1166
* #1167
* #1168
* #1169
* #1170
* #1171
* #1172
* #1173
* #1174
* #1175
* #1177
* #1178
* #1180
* #1181
* #1182
* #1183
* #1184
* #1185
* #1187
* #1188
* #1189
* #1190
* #1191
* #1192
* #1193
* #1194
* #1195
* #1196
* #1198
* #1199
* #1200
* #1201
* #1203
* #1204
* #1205
* #1206
* #1207
* #1208
* #1209
* #1210
* #1211
* #1212
* #1213
* #1214
* #1215
* #1216
* #1217
* #1219
* #1220
* #1221
* #1222
* #1223
* #1224
* #1225
* #1226
* #1227
* #1229
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistencies in the volumes
3 participants