Rollup of 4 pull requests

[jieyouxu]

Successful merges:

• [AIX] Add option -X32_64 to the "strip" command #133217 ([AIX] Add option -X32_64 to the "strip" command)
• Minimally constify Add #133237 (Minimally constify Add)
• Add language tests for aggregate types #133355 (Add language tests for aggregate types)
• show abi_unsupported_vector_types lint in future breakage reports #133374 (show abi_unsupported_vector_types lint in future breakage reports)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[jieyouxu]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit f5cfb90 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f5cfb90 with merge 15b663e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing 15b663e to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#133217	[AIX] Add option -X32_64 to the "strip" command	317d65e3c70220173caa62f947056ac9d1a7e8d2 (link)
#133237	Minimally constify Add	a9fa63d554f38569e0de9eb732281fff672ef253 (link)
#133355	Add language tests for aggregate types	d72bf4ad6ab5a5de237ed2cd533d5e87a574f526 (link)
#133374	show abi_unsupported_vector_types lint in future breakage r…	5500c6d4093e810bc5e26ade3d71777f4ea7251b (link)

previous master: 386a7c7ae2

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (15b663e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.7%	[4.7%, 4.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (primary -2.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 798.452s -> 797.977s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 336.33 MiB -> 336.34 MiB (0.00%)