Skip to content

Conversation

@overlookmotel
Copy link
Member

@overlookmotel overlookmotel commented Sep 12, 2025

Fixes #13694.

Some 32-bit platforms give u64 and f64 alignment of 8, and others alignment of 4. WASM32 uses alignment 8, and layout calculator assumes that.

Skip layout assertions for platforms where alignment is 4, because we know some layouts are wrong for those platforms, and it causes compilation failure in debug builds. But retain the assertions for other 32-bit platforms (notably WASM), to make sure they remain correct. This will make it easier to extend raw transfer support to WASM later on.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-linter Area - Linter A-ast Area - AST A-ast-tools Area - AST tools C-bug Category - Bug labels Sep 12, 2025
Copy link
Member Author


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@overlookmotel overlookmotel marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2025 06:20
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 12, 2025 06:20
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 12, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #13716 will not alter performance

Comparing 09-12-fix_raw_transfer_disable_layout_assertions_on_some_32-bit_platforms (ab51394) with main (bda5fc1)1

Summary

✅ 37 untouched

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (ab51394) during the generation of this report, so bda5fc1 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes compilation failures on 32-bit platforms by conditionally disabling layout assertions based on alignment characteristics. The issue stems from different 32-bit platforms having varying alignment requirements for u64 and f64 types - some use 8-byte alignment while others use 4-byte alignment.

  • Conditionally disable layout assertions on 32-bit platforms with 4-byte alignment for u64/f64
  • Preserve assertions for WASM32 and other 32-bit platforms with 8-byte alignment to maintain correctness
  • Add comprehensive documentation explaining the platform-specific alignment differences

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@overlookmotel overlookmotel removed the request for review from leaysgur September 12, 2025 06:23
@overlookmotel overlookmotel self-assigned this Sep 12, 2025
@overlookmotel overlookmotel added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 12, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

overlookmotel commented Sep 12, 2025

Merge activity

…#13716)

Fixes #13694.

Some 32-bit platforms give `u64` and `f64` alignment of 8, and others alignment of 4. WASM32 uses alignment 8, and layout calculator assumes that.

Skip layout assertions for platforms where alignment is 4, because we know some layouts are wrong for those platforms, and it causes compilation failure in debug builds. But retain the assertions for other 32-bit platforms (notably WASM), to make sure they remain correct. This will make it easier to extend raw transfer support to WASM later on.
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-12-fix_raw_transfer_disable_layout_assertions_on_some_32-bit_platforms branch from 7b98cca to ab51394 Compare September 12, 2025 06:24
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit ab51394 into main Sep 12, 2025
26 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 09-12-fix_raw_transfer_disable_layout_assertions_on_some_32-bit_platforms branch September 12, 2025 06:29
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 12, 2025
camc314 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
## [1.16.0] - 2025-09-16

### 🚀 Features

- 97c8d06 linter: Add `preserve-caught-error` rule (#13748) (孔辉)
- 8c19b18 linter/exhaustive-deps: Implement fixer for dep in global
scope (#13783) (camc314)
- 06bce8f linter/exhaustive-deps: Implement fixer for missing dep
(#13782) (camc314)
- a8675f4 linter: Add eslint/class-methods-use-this rule (#12977) (Peter
Cardenas)
- db33196 parser: Adds typescript rule for empty argument list (#13730)
(Karan Kiri)
- 2751193 linter: Add `eslint/no-useless-computed-key` rule (#13428)
(yefan)
- 9a205d1 regex-parser: Parse simple `TemplateLiterals` (#13265) (Sysix)

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

- a2c91cd linter: Drop `rules` to allow mutable access to `ctx_host` in
`run_external_rules` (#13832) (camc314)
- 3af1e5d linter/no-unsafe-declaration-merging: Always mark first span
as primary (#13830) (camc314)
- 1c43c7c linter: Keep message when merging composite fixes (#13827)
(camc314)
- 26af302 linter/exhaustive-deps: Check stable value is on lhs of
assignment expr (#13815) (camc314)
- 4bc12d0 linter/exhaustive-deps: Remove impossible comparison with
parent kind (#13814) (camc314)
- 12baf5e linter/exhaustive-deps: Respect primary span when identifying
disable directive location (#13781) (camc314)
- fa7400a linter/no-undef: False positive with `arguments` in functions
(#13763) (camc314)
- 50e6e3c editor: Restrict servers paths for `oxc.path.server` (#13740)
(Sysix)
- b45077d editor: Strip leading slash for bin path on windows (#13738)
(Sysix)
- 8fa6227 editor: Don't allow `oxc.path.server` for untrusted workspaces
(#13734) (Sysix)
- 56da114 linter/react/jsx-handler-names: Do not detect the function
name within the inline-function's body block (#13456) (Takuji Shimokawa)
- b2bc5b4 linter/react-perf/jsx-no-new-object-as-prop: Skip as/satisfies
exprs (#13718) (camc314)
- ab51394 raw_transfer: Disable layout assertions on some 32-bit
platforms (#13716) (overlookmotel)
- 09428f6 linter/plugins: Remove outdated comment (#13691)
(overlookmotel)
- a294721 linter/plugins: Exit early if JS plugins enabled on
unsupported platforms (#13689) (overlookmotel)
- 68a2280 linter/plugins: More graceful exit for
`--experimental-js-plugins` CLI option (#13688) (overlookmotel)

### 🚜 Refactor

- 395d40d linter: Derive inmpls for `PartialEq`, `Eq` over manual ones
(#13828) (camc314)
- 8e4cd8f linter/func-names: Use `run_once` over looping over all nodes
(#13798) (camc314)
- 7f4e2fe eslint/func-names: Clean up implementation and improve
documentation (#13601) (Antoine Zanardi)
- 137896a language_server: Split options for linting and formatting
(#13627) (Sysix)
- 7346099 linter: Move `oxlint` application code into separate module
(#13745) (overlookmotel)
- 6dd4107 linter: Remove `#[cfg(test)]` attributes from `tester` module
(#13714) (overlookmotel)
- c40c6ef linter/plugins: Directory for JS plugins-related code (#13701)
(overlookmotel)
- a0022c1 linter/plugins: Improve error messages for JS plugins (#13699)
(overlookmotel)
- 1fd993f napi/oxlint: Rename `napi/oxlint2` to `napi/oxlint` (#13682)
(overlookmotel)

### ⚡ Performance

- 90c8286 linter: Detect node types from `let..else` statements (#13690)
(camchenry)
- 08c05df semantic: Make CFG construction a compile-time feature
(#13678) (Boshen)

### 🎨 Styling

- 99a7638 linter: Add comments + re-organise imports (#13715)
(overlookmotel)

### 🧪 Testing

- 18a1145 linter: Add debug assertions for skipping rules (#13724)
(camc314)
- cb080de linter/no-unused-vars: Add test for non ASCII chars in JSX
components (#13820) (camc314)
- b6eba27 linter/no-undef: Add more test cases for `arguments` (#13764)
(camc314)
- fb2d087 linter: Set CWD for tests (#13722) (overlookmotel)

Co-authored-by: camc314 <18101008+camc314@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-ast Area - AST A-ast-tools Area - AST tools A-linter Area - Linter C-bug Category - Bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

does oxlint support 32-bit x86 GNU/Linux, or is this an unsupported platform for which issues should not be reported?

3 participants