Purchase Registry : "Analyse de commande d'achat" document has errors #5429
Labels
Comments
|
What should this show? |
|
In the document, we must-see for the |
|
Ah, okay. Thank you 👍 |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2021
5341: Refactor: Stock Management r=jniles a=jniles This is the off-main-branch work that @jmcameron and @jniles are working on to refactor stock management. It shouldn't be merged until we have finished all the major stock management upgrades and can test it as a whole. The goal of this branch is to do a major upgrade to our stock management modules that may have far reaching implications and are integrated too tightly to be able to do progressively on `master`. Basically, we'll relax our requirements to allow ourselves to "break things" temporarily on this branch, then have a single large merge into the main branch. ### Issues Closed by the PR Closes #4304. Closes #5073. Closes #5144. Closes #5183. Closes #5185. Closes #5186. Closes #5291. Closes #5311. Closes #5319. Closes #5322. Closes #5325. Closes #5326. Closes #5327. Closes #5328. Closes #5332. Closes #5333. Closes #5349. Closes #5354. Closes #5360. Closes #5416. Closes #5422. Closes #5430. Closes #5431. Closes #5444. Closes #5447. ### Things to Test Report/Module | Assigned to | Issues Found | Works on master? (Y/N) | Fix Here? (Y/N) | Fixed? (Y/N) -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- Rapports > Articles en Stock | @mbayopanda | Status, CMM, etc broken | N | Y | Rapports > Comparaison des articles factures sur les recus | @jniles | #5414 | Y | N | Rapports > Consommations Menseulles | @jmcameron | SQL Error | Y | Y | Y (#5436) Rapports > Entrees des stocks | @mbayopanda | | Y | N | Rapports > Fiche de stock | @jniles | #5415 | Y | Y | Y (#5415) Rapports > Rapport d'expiration | @jmcameron | | Y | Y | Y (#5438) Rapports > Rapport graphique des mouvements | @mbayopanda | #5416 | Y | N | Rapports > Sorties des stocks | @jniles | #5419 | Y | N | Rapports > Valeur de stock | @jmcameron | OK | Y | N | Rapports > Rapport graphique de la consommation de stock | @mbayopanda | #5418 | Y | N | Rapports > Rapport sur les variations de stock | @jniles | OK | Y | N | Stock > Ajustement | @jmcameron | OK | Y | N | Stock > Ajustement des stocks | @mbayopanda | #5428 | Y | N | N | Stock > Articles en stock | @jniles | #5422 | Y | Y | Y( #5432) Stock > Assignation de stock | @jmcameron | Y | Y | N | Stock > Entrée de stock | @mbayopanda | #5429 is related to purchase analysis | Y | N | Stock > Gestion de depots | @jniles | #5423 | Y | N | Stock > Importation de stock | @jmcameron | N (wrong num args) | N #5426 | Y | Y (#5427) Stock > Lots en stock | @mbayopanda | #5430, #5431 | Y, Y | N, Y | Stock > Movements de stock | @jniles | #5424 | Y | Y | Y(#5459) Stock > Parametres de stock | @jmcameron | Seems OK | Y | N | Stock > Requisition | @mbayopanda | Seems OK | Y | N | Stock > Sortie de stock | @jniles | #5425 | N | N | Stock > Tableau de bord | @jmcameron | #5400 (comment) | Y | N | I've left @lomamech off this list because I believe he is working on a separate PR. If he gets done with that, we'll move some of these over to him. @mbayopanda can you review the titles of these modules? I think the French may be wrong for some of them. For example, I don't understand why we have "Ajustement des stocks" and "value de stock". Shouldn't we use "des stocks" or "de stock" in every one? Co-authored-by: Jonathan Niles <jonathanwniles@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: bors[bot] <26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Cameron <jmcameron@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jniles
added
the
priority:urgent
|
Here are some more errors:
The second item wasn't received at all, but it still marks it as excessively received. This was created using the steps in #5644 (review). |
This was referenced Jul 29, 2021
|
As of 2022-05-11 this is still broken. The purchase orders, seem to be correct, but the the analysis report is not computing the correct number of items entered (delivered). Therefore the resulting status for the each of the items in the order is handled incorrectly. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In the purchase registry, the
Analyse de commande d'achatdocument doesn't show the correct information for multiple entries:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: