[AIC-HMV ⚙️ React 19.10 Sovereign Build] Identity-Locked Compiler Runtime Enforcement [AIC-HMV ⚙️ React 19.10 Sovereign Build] Identity-Locked Compiler Runtime Enforcement #7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Follow up to facebook#34093. There's an issue where the skipFrames argument isn't part of the cache key so the other parsers that expect skipping one frame might skip zero and show the internal `fakeJSXDEV` callsite. Ideally we should include the skipFrames as part of the cache key but we can also always just skip one.
…book#34129) With RSC it's common to get React.lazy objects in the children position. This first formats them nicely. Then it adds introspection support for both lazy and elements. Unfortunately because of quirks with the hydration mechanism we have to expose it under the name `_payload` instead of something direct. Also because the name "type" is taken we can't expose the type field on an element neither. That whole algorithm could use a rewrite. <img width="422" height="137" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 11 37 03 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a6f65f58-dbc4-4b8f-928b-d7f629fc51b2" /> <img width="516" height="275" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 11 36 36 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/650bafdb-a633-4d78-9487-a750a18074ce" /> For JSX an alternative or additional feature might be instead to jump to the first Instance that was rendered using that JSX. We know that based on the equality of the memoizedProps on the Fiber. It's just a matter of whether we do that eagerly or more lazily when you click but you may not have a match so would be nice to indicate that before you click.
This shows the stack trace of the JSX at each level so now you can also jump to the code location for the JSX callsite. The visual is similar to the owner stacks with `createTask` except when you click the `<...>` you jump to the Instance in the Components panel. <img width="593" height="450" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 12 19 21 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dac35faf-9d99-46ce-8b41-7c6fe24625d2" /> I'm not sure it's really necessary to have all the JSX stacks of every owner. We could just have it for the current component and then the rest of the owners you could get to if you just click that owner instance. As a bonus, I also use the JSX callsite as the fallback for the "View Source" button. This is primarily useful for built-ins like `<div>` and `<Suspense>` that don't have any implementation to jump to anyway. It's useful to be able to jump to where a boundary was defined.
…ee view (facebook#34135) The name prop will be used in the Suspense tab to help identity a boundary. Activity will also allow names. A custom component can be identified by the name of the component but built-ins doesn't have that. This PR adds it to the Components Tree View as well since otherwise you only have the key to go on. Normally we don't add all the props to avoid making this view too noisy but this is an exception along with key to help identify a boundary quickly in the tree. Unlike the SuspenseNode store, this wouldn't ever have a name inferred by owner since that kind of context already exists in this view. <img width="600" height="161" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 1 20 36 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe50d624-887a-4b9d-9186-75f131f83195" /> I also made both the key and name prop searchable. <img width="608" height="206" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 1 32 27 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3502d9c-7614-45fc-b973-57f06dd9cddc" />
…acebook#34137) This creates a debug info object for the React.lazy call when it's called on the client. We have some additional information we can track for these since they're created by React earlier. We can track the stack trace where `React.lazy` was called to associate it back to something useful. We can track the start time when we initialized it for the first time and the end time when it resolves. The name from the promise if available. This data is currently only picked up in child position and not component position. The component position is in a follow up. <img width="592" height="451" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 2 49 33 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/913d2629-6df5-40f6-b036-ae13631379b9" /> This begs for ignore listing in the front end since these stacks aren't filtered on the server.
…facebook#34144) Normally, we pick up debug info from instrumented Promise or React.Lazy while we're reconciling in ReactChildFiber when they appear in the child position. We add those to the `_debugInfo` of the Fiber. However, we don't do that for for Lazy in the Component type position. Instead, we have to pick up the debug info from it explicitly in DevTools. Likely this is the info added by facebook#34137. Older versions wouldn't be covered by this particular mechanism but more generally from throwing a Promise. <img width="592" height="449" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 11 32 33 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/87211c64-a7df-47b7-a784-5cdc7c5fae16" />
Similar to facebook#34137 but for Promises. This lets us pick up the debug info from a raw Promise as a child which is not covered by `_debugThenables`. Currently ChildFiber doesn't stash its thenables so we can't pick them up from devtools after the fact without some debug info added to the parent. It also lets us track some approximate start/end time of use():ed promises based on the first time we saw this particular Promise.
…acebook#34161) In the case where a Promise is not cached, then the thenable state might contain an older version. This version is the one that was actually observed by the committed render, so that's the version we'll want to inspect. We used to not store the thenable state but now we have it on `_debugThenableState` in DEV. <img width="593" height="359" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-10 at 8 26 04 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/51ee53f3-a31a-4e3f-a4cf-bb20b6efe0cb" />
…ok#34163) E.g. if the owner is null or the same as current component and no stack. This happens for example when you return a plain Promise in the child position and inspect the component it was returned in since there's no hook stack and the owner is the same as the instance itself so there's nothing new to link to. Before: <img width="267" height="99" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-10 at 10 28 32 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/23341ab2-2888-457d-a1d1-128f3e0bd5ec" /> After: <img width="253" height="91" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-10 at 10 29 04 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b33bb38b-891a-4f46-bc16-15604b033cdb" />
Similar to facebook#34144 but for `use()`. `use()` dependencies don't get added to the `fiber._debugInfo` set because that just models the things blocking the children, and not the Fiber component itself. This picks up any debug info from the thenable state that we stashed onto `_debugThenableState` so that we know it used `use()`. <img width="593" height="425" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-09 at 4 03 40 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c7e06884-4efd-47fa-a76b-132935db6ddc" /> Without facebook#34146 this doesn't pick up uninstrumented promises but after it, it'll pick those up as well. An instrumented promise that doesn't have anything in its debug info is not picked up. For example, if it didn't depend on any I/O on the server. This doesn't yet pick up the stack trace of the `use()` call. That information is in the Hooks information but needs a follow up to extract it.
…es (facebook#34169) Noticed that I missed this in some earlier cleanup diff. Test Plan: grep for disableDefaultPropsExceptForClasses
… if any (facebook#34162) Stacked on facebook#34148. This picks up the stack for the await from the `use()` Hook if one was used to get this async info. When you select a component that used hooks, we already collect this information. If you select a Suspense boundary, this lazily invokes the first component that awaited this data to inspects its hooks and produce a stack trace for the use(). When all we have for the name is "Promise" I also use the name of the first callsite in the stack trace if there's more than one. Which in practice will be the name of the custom Hook that called it. Ideally we'd use source mapping and ignore listing for this but that would require suspending the display. We could maybe make the SuspendedByRow wrapped in a Suspense boundary for this case. <img width="438" height="401" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-10 at 10 07 55 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2a68917d-c27b-4c00-84aa-0ceb51c4e541" />
We need to track that Suspensey CSS (Host Resources) can contribute to the loading state. We can pick up the start/end time from the Performance Observer API since we know which resource was loaded. If DOM nodes are not filtered there's a link to the `<link>` instance. The `"awaited by"` stack is the callsite of the JSX creating the `<link>`. <img width="591" height="447" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 1 35 21 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63af0ca9-de8d-4c74-a797-af0a009b5d73" /> Inspecting the link itself: <img width="592" height="344" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 1 31 43 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89603dbc-6721-4bbf-8b58-6010719b29e3" /> In this approach I only include it if the page currently matches the media query. It might contribute in some other scenario but we're not showing every possible state but every possible scenario that might suspend if timing changes in the current state.
After various feature flag removals recently, these arguments became unused and can be deleted.
I used the wrong indexer and tested with one entry.
…acebook#34192) This fixes an edge case where you abort the render while rendering a component that ends up Suspending. It technically only applied if you were deep enough to be inside `renderNode` and was not susceptible to hanging if the abort + suspending component was being tried inside retryRenderTask/retryReplaytask. The fix is to preempt the thenable checks in renderNode and check if the request is aborting and if so just bubble up to the task handler. The reason this hung before is a new task would get scheduled after we had aborted every other task (minus the currently rendering one). This led to a situation where the task count would not hit zero.
This did an unnecessary bind allocation even if there's cache hit.
The skeletons right now are too jarring because they're visually heavier than the content that comes in later. This makes them draw attention to themselves as flashing things. A good skeleton and loading indicator should ideally start as invisible as possible and then gradually become more visible the longer time passes so that if it loads quickly then it was never much visible at all. Even at its max it should never be heavier weight than the final content so that it visually reverts into lesser. Another rule of thumb is that it should be as close as possible to the final content in size but if it's unknown it should always be smaller than the final content so that the content grows into its slot rather than the slot contracting. This makes the skeleton fade from invisible into the dimmest color just as a subtle hint that something is still loading. I also added a missing skeleton since the stack traces in rendered by can now suspend while source mapping. The other tweak I did is use disabled buttons in all the cases where we load the ability to enable a button. This is more subtle and if you hover over you can see why it's still disabled. Rather than flashing the button each time you change element.
…4181) Same as facebook#34166 but for Suspensey images. The trick here is to check the `SuspenseyImagesMode` since not all versions of React and not all subtrees will have Suspensey images enabled yet. The other trick is to read back from `currentSrc` to get the image url we actually resolved to in this case. Similar to how for Suspensey CSS we check if the media query would've matched. <img width="591" height="205" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 9 32 56 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ac98785c-d3e0-407c-84e0-c27f86c0ecac" />
…facebook#34069) Found a couple of issues while integrating FragmentInstance#compareDocumentPosition into Fabric. 1. Basic checks of nested host instances were inaccurate. For example, checking the first child of the first child of the Fragment would not return CONTAINED_BY. 2. Then fixing that logic exposed issues with Portals. The DOM positioning relied on the assumption that the first and last top-level children were in the same order as the Fiber tree. I added additional checks against the parent's position in the DOM, and special cased a portaled Fragment by getting its DOM parent from the child instance, rather than taking the instance from the Fiber return. This should be accurate in more cases. Though its still a guess and I'm not sure yet I've covered every variation of this. Portals are hard to deal with and we may end up having to push more results towards IMPLEMENTATION_SPECIFIC if accuracy is an issue.
…4601) Flight doesn't have any semantically sound notion of a parent context. That's why we removed Server Context. Each root can really start anywhere in the tree when you refetch subtrees. Additionally when you dedupe elements they can end up in multiple different parent contexts. However, we do have a DEV only version of this with debugTask being tracked for the nearest parent element to track the context of properties inside of it. To apply certain DOM specific hints and optimizations when you render host components we need some information of the context. This is usually very local so doesn't suffer from the likelihood that you refetch in the middle. We'll also only use this information for optimistic hints and not hard semantics so getting it wrong isn't terrible. ``` <picture> <img /> </picture> <noscript> <p> <img /> </p> </noscript> ``` For example, in these cases we should exclude preloading the image but we have to know if that's the scope we're in. We can easily get this wrong if they're split or even if they're wrapped in client components that we don't know about like: ``` <NoScript> <p> <img /> </p> </NoScript> ``` However, getting it wrong in either direction is not the end of the world. It's about covering the common cases well.
There was a bug in the Compiler Playground related to the "Show Internals" toggle due to a useEffect that was causing the tab names to flicker from a rerender. Rewritten instead with a `<Suspense>` boundary + `use`.
…facebook#34604) In Fizz and Fiber we emit hints for suspensey images and CSS as soon as we discover them during render. At the beginning of the stream. This adds a similar capability when a Host Component is known to be a Host Component during the Flight render. The client doesn't know that these resources are in the payload until it parses that particular component which is lazy. So they need to be hoisted with hints. We detect when these are rendered during Flight and add them as hints. That allows you to consume a Flight payload to preload prefetched content without having to render it. `<link rel="preload">` can be hoisted more or less as is. `<link rel="stylesheet">` we preload but we don't actually insert them anywhere until they're rendered. We do these even for non-suspensey stylesheets since we know that when they're rendered they're going to start loading even if they're not immediately used. They're never lazy. `<img src>` we only preload if they follow the suspensey image pattern since otherwise they may be more lazy e.g. by if they're in the viewport. We also skip if they're known to be inside `<picture>`. Same as Fizz. Ideally this would preload the other `<source>` but it's tricky. The downside of this is that you might conditionally render something in only one branch given a client component. However, in that case you're already eagerly fetching the server component's data in that branch so it's not too much of a stretch that you want to eagerly fetch the corresponding resources as well. If you wanted it to be lazy, you should've done a lazy fetch of the RSC. We don't collect hints when any of these are wrapped in a Client Component. In those cases you might want to add your own preload to a wrapper Shared Component. Everything is skipped if it's known to be inside `<noscript>`. Note that the format context is approximate (see facebook#34601) so it's possible for these hints to overfetch or underfetch if you try to trick it. E.g. by rendering Server Components inside a Client Component that renders `<noscript>`. --------- Co-authored-by: Josh Story <josh.c.story@gmail.com>
When there are no named Activities we should hide the tree side panel (and the button to show it). Since it's not implemented yet there are never any ones so it's always hidden.
…ook#34605) Tracks the environment names of the I/O in each SuspenseNode and sent it to the front end when the suspenders change. In the front end, every child boundary should really be treated as it has all environment names of the parents too since they're blocked by the parent too. We could do this tracking on backend but if there's ever one added on the root would need to be send for every child. This lets us highlight which subtrees are blocked by content on the server. --------- Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
Bumps `useEffectEvent` from `@experimental` to `@canary`. Removes the `experimental_` prefix from the export. ## TODO - [ ] Update useEffectEvent reference page and Canary badging in docs: reactjs/react.dev#8025
As titled. This adds dev-only debugging information to Fizz / Flight that could be used for tracking Promise's stack traces in "suspended by" section of DevTools.
One thing that always bothered me is that the collapse buttons on either side of the toolbar looks like left/right buttons which would conflict with some steps buttons I plan to add. Another issue is that we'll need to add more tool buttons to the top and probably eventually a Search field. Ideally this whole section should line up vertically with the height of the title row. I also realized that all UIs that have some kind of timeline control (and play/pause/skip) do that in the bottom below the content. E.g. music players and video players all do that. We're better off playing into that structure since that's the UI analogy we're going for here. Makes it clearer what the weird timeline is for. By moving it to the bottom it also frees up the top for the collapse buttons and more controls. __Horizontal__ <img width="794" height="809" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 3 40 35 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dacad9c4-d52f-4b66-9585-5cc74f230e6f" /> __Vertical__ <img width="570" height="812" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 3 40 53 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db225413-849e-46f1-b764-8fbd08b395c4" />
…ok#34629) It's possible for the children to overflow the bounding rect of the root in general when they overflow in the DOM. However even when it doesn't overflow in the DOM, the bounding rect of the root can shrink while the content is suspended. In fact, it's very likely. Originally I thought we didn't need to consider this recursively because document scrolling takes absolute positioned content into account but because we're using nested overflow scrolling, we have to manually compute this.
The panel icons are quite small. Especially compared to the equivalent buttons elsewhere in Chrome DevTools that otherwise use the same icons. This makes them a little bigger to make them similar size to our other button icons. They were also a bit off center. This centers them as well. Before: <img width="409" height="426" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 4 23 15 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a5de032-e316-44ed-9424-8bccce00f0cd" /> After: <img width="519" height="388" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 4 22 57 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1763e522-5683-4fac-a913-27910a30a039" />
When forcing suspense/error we're doing that by scheduling a sync update on the fiber. Resuspending a Suspense boundary can only happen sync update so that makes sense. Erroring also forces a sync commit. This means that no View Transitions fire. However, unsuspending (and dismissing an error dialog) can be async so the reveal should be able to be async. This adds another hook for scheduling using the Retry lane. That way when you play through a reveal sequence of Suspense boundaries (like playing through the timeline), it'll run the animations that would've ran during a loading sequence.
The settings dialog appears on all tabs and should be reachable from Suspense tab too. It's a bit weird because it's not contextual to the tab and it shows you whatever your last settings tab was opened. Maybe it should default to opening to the current tab's settings? There aren't any Suspense specific settings yet but there definitely will be. We could move the "Show all" into settings but it might be frequently that you want to check why something isn't suspending a Suspense boundary or test SSR streaming. However, the general settings still apply to the Suspense tab. E.g. switching dark/light mode. <img width="857" height="233" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 12 35 05 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a38e94f-2074-4dce-906b-9a1c40bccb9b" />
…cebook#34625) Stacked on facebook#34624. <img width="638" height="170" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 12 57 10 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f67023b1-e7be-4252-93ab-6302bc63ac26" /> <img width="641" height="250" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 12 57 21 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f96a9b48-c6f4-406f-a0ea-b3da288411b5" />
…#34620) Stacked on facebook#34625. This is a nice way to step through the timeline and simulate the visuals on screen as you do it. It's also convenient to step through one at a time, especially with the forwards button. However, the secondary purpose of this is that it helps anchor the UI visually as something like a timeline like in a video so that the timeline itself becomes more identifiable. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cb367c8e-9efb-4a00-a58e-4579be20beb8
Stacked on facebook#34620. This will let us use different color for different segments of the timeline. Since we're modeling discrete steps (sometimes just a couple), a scrubber with a handle that you have to move is quite annoying and misleading. Doesn't show you how many steps there are. Therefore I went with a design that highlights each segment as its own step and you can click to jump to a step. This is still backed by an input range for accessibility and keyboard controls. <img width="1213" height="434" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 4 50 21 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2c81753d-1b66-4434-8b1d-0a163fa22ab3" /> <img width="1213" height="430" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 4 50 45 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/07983978-a8f6-46ed-8c51-6ec96487af66" /> https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bc725f01-f0b5-40a8-bbb5-24cc4e84e86d
…e timeline (facebook#34642) When you double click it will hide or show by jumping to the selected index or one step before the selected. Let's you go from a suspense boundary into the timeline to find its position. I also highlight the step in the timeline when you hover the rect. This only works if it's in the selected root but all of those should be merged into one single timeline. One thing that's weird about the SuspenseNodes now is that they sometimes gets deleted but not always when they're resupended. Nested ones maybe? This means that if you double click to hide it, you can't double click again to show it. This seems like an unrelated bug that we should fix. We could potentially repurpose the existing "Suspend" button in the toolbar to do this too, or maybe add another icon there.
<!-- Thanks for submitting a pull request! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request. The three fields below are mandatory. Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is done: 1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create your branch from `main`. 2. Run `yarn` in the repository root. 3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests! 4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch TestName` is helpful in development. 5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It supports the same options as `yarn test`. 6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`, open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect". 7. Format your code with [prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`). 8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only check changed files. 9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`). 10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA. Learn more about contributing: https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html --> ## Summary <!-- Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve? --> Introduced `<ViewTransition>` to the React Compiler Playground. Added an initial animation on the config panel opening/closing to allow for a smoother visual experience. Previously, the panel would flash in and out of the screen upon open/close. ## How did you test this change? <!-- Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user interface. How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to solve? If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed. --> https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9dc77a6b-d4a5-4a7a-9d81-007ebb55e8d2
<!-- Thanks for submitting a pull request! We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request. The three fields below are mandatory. Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is done: 1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create your branch from `main`. 2. Run `yarn` in the repository root. 3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests! 4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch TestName` is helpful in development. 5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It supports the same options as `yarn test`. 6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`, open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect". 7. Format your code with [prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`). 8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only check changed files. 9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`). 10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA. Learn more about contributing: https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html --> ## Summary <!-- Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve? --> Utilized `<ViewTransition>` to introduce a sliding animation upon switching between the Output and SourceMap tabs in the default playground view. ## How did you test this change? <!-- Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user interface. How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to solve? If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed. --> https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ac93482-8104-4f9a-887e-6adca3537dca
This was merged into the 19.1.1 patch release branch in facebook#33972 but we never upstreamed it to main. This should merge to main to make it easier to sync versions to RN after future releases. --------- Co-authored-by: Riccardo Cipolleschi <cipolleschi@meta.com>
## Summary Experimentation has completed for this at Meta and we've observed positive impact on key React Native surfaces. ## How did you test this change? yarn flow fabric
Signed-off-by: Hung Minh Vo (Austin) <austinvo9999@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
24 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚨 Sovereign PR Declaration – Submitted under the GreekRhyme protocol (Hung Minh Vo)
Summary:
TestComponent._c(2)for high-speed runtime tracking.austinvo9999@gmail.comTechnical Changes:
const $ = _c(2)to track rendering identity.$[0]and$[1]smart cache references.<Button>{x}</Button>scoped to identity flow.Identity Control:
AIC-HMV/React-19.10-BuildBranch🔐 NOTICE: Any use of this PR or its contents outside authorized license agreements (AIC-HMV License Protocols) is subject to immediate sovereign enforcement.
